Grandal123 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Can't argue, personally I think Kirk is the best WR in the draft but I know I am one of very few that think it. Lots of talent available, Pace would really have to do something out of left field for me to be upset with our pick this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trentwannabe Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 So Bills starts the night with two first, two seconds, a third, a fourth and two 5ths. They end it with a QB, three seconds, two 3rds, a 4th and a 5th? Works for me, though I do think Rudolph would be available at 21. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Love this for Denver. Trading back and getting Baker. Yes please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smhx2519 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 1 hour ago, IrishHooligan00 said: There is no philosphy anymore, New Coach will have his own thoughts and philosphy on his QB he wants Bradford gives you a starter for a year or two bridge QB thats all. The front office has a philosophy on QBs and new coach will mirror that philosophy. Bradford is injury prone and not a reliable starter. Just ask Minnesota Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishHooligan00 Posted January 8, 2018 Author Share Posted January 8, 2018 5 minutes ago, Smhx2519 said: The front office has a philosophy on QBs and new coach will mirror that philosophy. Bradford is injury prone and not a reliable starter. Just ask Minnesota Its only a bridge QB anyways, He'll play a hell of a lot better then any of the other QBS on the roster. Also Depending on the Coach Front office might not have final say on QB, Coaches know they're married to the QB so they're going to want they're guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smhx2519 Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 2 hours ago, IrishHooligan00 said: Its only a bridge QB anyways, He'll play a hell of a lot better then any of the other QBS on the roster. Also Depending on the Coach Front office might not have final say on QB, Coaches know they're married to the QB so they're going to want they're guy. Bidwill and Keim have both stated they’re looking for a coach that messes well with them. As for Bradford why bring in a starter that can’t stay healthy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason_Bengal_Fl Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 I'm just not comfortable drafting another OT who has been injured all year. Will he be healthy enough to participate in the combine? If not, I prefer Brown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 I'm not quite sure why we would take McGlinchey over Nelson in this situation, since McGlinchey would just play guard for us for the next two years, but I do think he would make an excellent guard in the NFL, and I suppose having some upside for a potential tackle in the future is nice, so I wouldn't hate it by any means. Don't care for the free agency signing for the 49ers though lol. But Hill would just be a depth guy who may not even make the roster depending on how Williams does, so no harm in taking a shot on trying to revive the guys career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishHooligan00 Posted January 9, 2018 Author Share Posted January 9, 2018 7 hours ago, Forge said: I'm not quite sure why we would take McGlinchey over Nelson in this situation, since McGlinchey would just play guard for us for the next two years, but I do think he would make an excellent guard in the NFL, and I suppose having some upside for a potential tackle in the future is nice, so I wouldn't hate it by any means. Don't care for the free agency signing for the 49ers though lol. But Hill would just be a depth guy who may not even make the roster depending on how Williams does, so no harm in taking a shot on trying to revive the guys career. Hill would easily make the roster, He could even be your #1 RB, He didn't do well in CIN cause TBH its a ****ty offensive system and they could never get either RB Going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishHooligan00 Posted January 9, 2018 Author Share Posted January 9, 2018 11 hours ago, Jason_Bengal_Fl said: I'm just not comfortable drafting another OT who has been injured all year. Will he be healthy enough to participate in the combine? If not, I prefer Brown. Can't be as bad as that contract extension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason_Bengal_Fl Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 1 hour ago, IrishHooligan00 said: Can't be as bad as that contract extension Our O-line was easily our biggest issue this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 I get the idea behind the Alex Smith trade, I just don't think the Skins would have to give up that much. Either wait for him to get cut or give up a conditional pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 2 hours ago, IrishHooligan00 said: Hill would easily make the roster, He could even be your #1 RB, He didn't do well in CIN cause TBH its a ****ty offensive system and they could never get either RB Going. Gio averaged 4.4 yards per carry against Hill's 3.1. That's a significant difference. The only year where Hill has averaged 4 ypc is his first, meanwhile Gio has failed to reach that plateau only once in his career. Granted, Mixon only averaged 3.5, so it could just be as simple as Gio really is a fantastic running back but has to be limited in carries. Whether or not that is system or what, that's a bad look. Anyone who signs him is doing so on a super buy low with no real financial commitment, and he would absolutely be fighting for a roster spot. Sure, he may make the roster, but at the current point in time, I wouldn't guarantee it. With us, it may be something as simple as Joe Williams against Hill as we only carry 4 running backs, one of whom is a fullback (Juice Check). We can also rule out Hill taking Breida's speed/pass catching back role. So we would either have to dump Mostert, which seems unlikely given his special teams play, or Williams. Personally, If we are going after a running back (and I agree that we should given Hyde's free agent status), I'd like to see us shoot for the moon and go after Lewis given our cap space. Crowell could also make sense given that he and Shanny were together in Cleveland for a year. Hill doesn't excite me, though obviously at one point he was seen as a great potential, I just don't know that he's a lock to make the roster because I don't know how much of his struggles are on him, or just on the team, as you alluded to. If he's as good as you think he is, obviously I wouldn't complain if we signed him and he balled out, I just don't think he's as good as you do apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsin2013 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 The Skins trading away their 1st for a 33 year old QB? No thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishHooligan00 Posted January 9, 2018 Author Share Posted January 9, 2018 1 hour ago, MikeT14 said: I get the idea behind the Alex Smith trade, I just don't think the Skins would have to give up that much. Either wait for him to get cut or give up a conditional pick. KC is not going to just let him walk, they're going to want something for him, They can't just give up a conditional pick thats not how those work. they get a QB to fill there needs for now and get a 2nd 2nd rounder your essentially just drafting him with your 1st and getting a 2nd in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.