Forge Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 If it self corrects at the end of the draft Mike, I wouldn't worry about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Just now, Forge said: If it self corrects at the end of the draft Mike, I wouldn't worry about it Well the rookie pool is estimated but after adding all the potential draft amounts for my team, I would need to figure out how to release about 600k. After a 90 man roster and calculating in the top 51, I'm not really sure how easy it would be to cut without releasing players within the top 51. Don't think I'm the only one with this issue but we can let it run and see what happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Just now, ny92jefferis said: Well the rookie pool is estimated but after adding all the potential draft amounts for my team, I would need to figure out how to release about 600k. After a 90 man roster and calculating in the top 51, I'm not really sure how easy it would be to cut without releasing players within the top 51. Don't think I'm the only one with this issue but we can let it run and see what happens. Having to go back in to plug in the amounts will create more work than just doing it all at once, but I can work around that....just sucks to think about right now....haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trojan Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 dont count cap until the end of the draft, then gm's cut down to cap caused by rookies if it's an issue -- teams with most cap get to claim the released players first (like a trade with 0 comp) -- because FA rounds don't happen by then. that would work right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Just now, Trojan said: dont count cap until the end of the draft, then gm's cut down to cap caused by rookies if it's an issue -- teams with most cap get to claim the released players first (like a trade with 0 comp) -- because FA rounds don't happen by then. that would work right? I wanna say there is a couple fa rounds after the draft, just plug them in the UFA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Giants are looking to move up into the first round range 20 - 26 if I don't get raped doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 I think the rookie cap number should count as players are drafted. There have been teams that have needed to cut players as they signed UFA and other players, so I do not see how drafting a player makes it much different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Where were all these people looking to move up when I was on the clock? lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Just now, Forge said: Where were all these people looking to move up when I was on the clock? lol. Working. Would have been interested in discussing the option and cost to move from 14 to 10. Would likely have been targeting Fitzpatrick or Davenport. But with Fitzpatrick, Davenport, Landry and Ward all on the board, GB was really happy with that group being there at 10, thinking that at least 1 would make it to 14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Bills were playing with fire, but looks like they'll land Lamar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDOG_det Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 1 minute ago, squire12 said: Working. Would have been interested in discussing the option and cost to move from 14 to 10. Would likely have been targeting Fitzpatrick or Davenport. But with Fitzpatrick, Davenport, Landry and Ward all on the board, GB was really happy with that group being there at 10, thinking that at least 1 would make it to 14. Yeah I just got off work. I would've tried to jump you guys to get Landry if I had been around. Also I hate you for taking him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Just now, IDOG_det said: Yeah I just got off work. I would've tried to jump you guys to get Landry if I had been around. Also I hate you for taking him. GB was in some talks with Buffalo to move down to 18. Would have hoped that either Landry or Ward would make it to 18. No deal and GB gets Landry and Buffalo can now select Jackson if that is there desire....not sure if that is the plan as they may have other options at QB via trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 Best wide receiver in the draft just came off the board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 I was going to take Derwin at 3. So to move down and get some picks was good. Although I took less value to move down it worked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted March 8, 2018 Share Posted March 8, 2018 @NickChowaniec Congrats on getting your QB and not having to give up any picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.