Thaiphoon Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 I'm simply saying what they CAN do. I'm not ruling out Bruce and Danny being stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 There are several teams that can afford the $35 Mil tag easily so an extension isn’t a make or break for every team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted January 31, 2018 Author Share Posted January 31, 2018 I willing to work something out, but as I said before it can't bypass the tender offer sheet. If that means reworking the compensation of 2 first to something more manageable for a single year mock draft or delaying the time frame of being allowed to tag n trade to after the offer sheet deadline has expired to work out a trade. Whatever that is I'm just not going to allow tag n trades without some recourse, otherwise every team in this mock draft is going to take advantage of it and tag players with the purpose of trading them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishHooligan00 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 1 minute ago, MKnight82 said: There are several teams that can afford the $35 Mil tag easily so an extension isn’t a make or break for every team. No team is going to want a 1 year rental this isn't the NBA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Just now, IrishHooligan00 said: No team is going to want a 1 year rental this isn't the NBA QBs rule the world in the nfl man. Sam Bradford’s been traded for a 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishHooligan00 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Just now, MKnight82 said: QBs rule the world in the nfl man. Sam Bradford’s been traded for a 1st. Wasn't on a 1 year deal...or a 35 Million Cap figure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jch1911 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 5 minutes ago, ny92jefferis said: I willing to work something out, but as I said before it can't bypass the tender offer sheet. If that means reworking the compensation of 2 first to something more manageable for a single year mock draft or delaying the time frame of being allowed to tag n trade to after the offer sheet deadline has expired to work out a trade. Whatever that is I'm just not going to allow tag n trades without some recourse, otherwise every team in this mock draft is going to take advantage of it and tag players with the purpose of trading them. It could still be 2 1sts (one in 2018 & one in 2019) But you have to have them (leaves Texans out ) Plus aren't we limited to trading only two 2019 picks? So if a team chooses this method... they (1) must have two 1sts to trade and (2) can only trade one other 2019 pick (later in the mock) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 2 minutes ago, IrishHooligan00 said: Wasn't on a 1 year deal...or a 35 Million Cap figure. Cool. Well hey, I won’t offer Kirk Cousins to you, do you really have a problem with me trading him to someone else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 1 minute ago, jch1911 said: It could still be 2 1sts (one in 2018 & one in 2019) But you have to have them (leaves Texans out ) Plus aren't we limited to trading only two 2019 picks? So if a team chooses this method... they (1) must have two 1sts to trade and (2) can only trade one other 2019 pick (later in the mock) No one is trading two firsts for anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaiphoon Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 4 minutes ago, IrishHooligan00 said: No team is going to want a 1 year rental this isn't the NBA Kirk can continue to be tagged though. Contrary to popular belief, there's nothing in the CBA (See my link) that states that a player can't be tagged a 4th time. HOWEVER, that team would need to be the Browns (with their cap space) because it would then need to be 144% of the 3rd year franchise tag. Which makes it around 49m for the 4th year (if my math is right). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ny92mike Posted January 31, 2018 Author Share Posted January 31, 2018 8 minutes ago, ny92jefferis said: I willing to work something out, but as I said before it can't bypass the tender offer sheet. If that means reworking the compensation of 2 first to something more manageable for a single year mock draft or delaying the time frame of being allowed to tag n trade to after the offer sheet deadline has expired to work out a trade. Whatever that is I'm just not going to allow tag n trades without some recourse, otherwise every team in this mock draft is going to take advantage of it and tag players with the purpose of trading them. Yes No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishHooligan00 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Just now, MKnight82 said: Cool. Well hey, I won’t offer Kirk Cousins to you, do you really have a problem with me trading him to someone else? I dont wan't him haha, i know how he plays. I don't have a problem with it if its a realistic situation. I say if u come to a deal with someone, and they extend him the contract and trade gets posted and everyone gets 24-48 hours to approve it to see if ts fair. I honeslty think it should be either resign, franchise, or he hits FA. but its not like were playing in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jch1911 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 1 minute ago, MKnight82 said: No one is trading two firsts for anything. Not... real... world... just... a.... sim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Just now, IrishHooligan00 said: I dont wan't him haha, i know how he plays. I don't have a problem with it if its a realistic situation. I say if u come to a deal with someone, and they extend him the contract and trade gets posted and everyone gets 24-48 hours to approve it to see if ts fair. I honeslty think it should be either resign, franchise, or he hits FA. but its not like were playing in real life. He can get traded irl! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishHooligan00 Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 1 minute ago, Thaiphoon said: Kirk can continue to be tagged though. Contrary to popular belief, there's nothing in the CBA (See my link) that states that a player can't be tagged a 4th time. HOWEVER, that team would need to be the Browns (with their cap space) because it would then need to be 144% of the 3rd year franchise tag. Which makes it around 49m for the 4th year (if my math is right). Correct, however Guaranteed that goes straight to arbitration. and the player gets the benefit of the doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.