Jump to content

This Is Rival Talk v1.0


CWood21

Recommended Posts

On 4/26/2024 at 12:28 PM, Mazrimiv said:

BB also wanted to replace Brady with Jimmy G, and then he did replace Brady with Mac Jones.

He has good taste in women it appears but not QBs. He seems to like them young

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/20/2024 at 8:25 AM, Eternal said:

He has good taste in women it appears but not QBs. He seems to like them young

What on earth, besides his fame and money could a young woman possibly see in him? I'm old and this creeps me out. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Old Guy said:

What on earth, besides his fame and money could a young woman possibly see in him? I'm old and this creeps me out. 

Women are attracted to high status men. This is a biological imperative as deeply coded into their DNA as a birds desire to fly south for the winter. 

Pretending this isn't the case is as absurd as any of the Left's rejections of biological realities. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

Women are attracted to high status men. This is a biological imperative as deeply coded into their DNA as a birds desire to fly south for the winter. 

Pretending this isn't the case is as absurd as any of the Left's rejections of biological realities. 

So, you're saying they are gold diggers in a very polite manner! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AlexGreen#20 said:

Women are attracted to high status men. This is a biological imperative as deeply coded into their DNA as a birds desire to fly south for the winter. 

Pretending this isn't the case is as absurd as any of the Left's rejections of biological realities. 

Wait...

It's the right that can't under biology. They stop at like a 2nd grade understanding of it lol. Everything is black/white/simple and unnuanced to them. The left recognizes it's complex. The actual truth.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like sure there exist women who want to hook up with high status guys, but there aren't a great number of statements regarding preference that apply to "all women" or "all men" for that matter. 

Like you might say "it's a biological imperative for men to have children with as many women as possible" but there's for sure men out there that don't want to have any children at all.  Individuals make choices, and it's probable that hoodie's arm candy is more interested in "he's wealthy" and "he's actually very charming and funny when you don't insult his intelligence" than any sort of "biological imperative."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PossibleCabbage said:

Like sure there exist women who want to hook up with high status guys, but there aren't a great number of statements regarding preference that apply to "all women" or "all men" for that matter. 

Like you might say "it's a biological imperative for men to have children with as many women as possible" but there's for sure men out there that don't want to have any children at all.  Individuals make choices, and it's probable that hoodie's arm candy is more interested in "he's wealthy" and "he's actually very charming and funny when you don't insult his intelligence" than any sort of "biological imperative."

Obviously these sort of things run on a bell curve. That should go without saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, incognito_man said:

Wait...

It's the right that can't under biology. They stop at like a 2nd grade understanding of it lol. Everything is black/white/simple and unnuanced to them. The left recognizes it's complex. The actual truth.

Can men get pregnant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said:

Just don't imply "all" statements when there are obviously exceptions.  That should go without saying.

Tell you what, why don't we both save a ton of time and typing, and you just imagine: 

"* With the exception of an inconsequential number of wild outliers."

at the end of all my posts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is just usually not necessary to paint with a broad brush.  English has all sorts of great hedging words, and their use is standard in scientific literature, since one is always working with "less than the maximum amount of data."  But be particularly careful when drawing from the EvoPsych well for pop science, there's a lot of BS that basically exists to reinforce existing biases that's not actually good science.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...