Donzo Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 5 minutes ago, Norm said: I'm dumb, sorry. Now that's an lol... lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cakeshoppe Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 Just now, Donzo said: Now that's an lol... lol! do you pronounce this "an el-oh-el"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted September 8, 2018 Author Share Posted September 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Donzo said: Odd, there's no confusion about Zettel's claim... I don't know how you could miss that?!? Here's a link for ya: https://www.education.com/magazine/article/fifth-grade-reading-comprehension/ Dude, we’ve all known about this since the news broke. What’s odd, is your original post to Cheech made it seem like you were confused about it, so I tried doing a good thing. SMFH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 6 minutes ago, Cheech said: I've been down these rabbit holes before. I've entertained it long enough. I've said my peace. I'm done. Rabbit hole?... Nah, it's a cheech hole. Again, you made up a bunch of nonsense to fuel your agenda to hate on Fackrell... I just asked you to backup your nonsense. Your response is to play the victim card and exit. Again, a cheech hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 5 minutes ago, Sasquatch said: Dude, we’ve all known about this since the news broke. What’s odd, is your original post to Cheech made it seem like you were confused about it, so I tried doing a good thing. SMFH. Sport, I was clearly asking for proof of the spin cheech put on the claim, not on the claim itself... If you missed that, that's your issue... Buy, ya, SMFH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 13 minutes ago, Cakeshoppe said: do you pronounce this "an el-oh-el"? No, it's L-O-L... The "an" was a phonetic call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted September 8, 2018 Author Share Posted September 8, 2018 12 minutes ago, Donzo said: Sport, I was clearly asking for proof of the spin cheech put on the claim, not on the claim itself... If you missed that, that's your issue... Buy, ya, SMFH. Yeah, I must have missed that. For the record, I have no comment on why GB put in a claim for Zettel as it relates to Fackrell - I don’t have inside information from 1265 to know their reasons. As far as this being “my issue” folks around here know I don’t have issues with most folks - I interject into other's conversations to try and bring clarity - not condescension. You clearly missed that in my post - that’s your issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 Maybe the Zettel claim was to add another player to the DL and bump Lowry down a notch? Maybe the Zettel claim was to add another player overall to the D rotation and allow some more variability in combinations for game day actives vs various teams and would allow GB to move a WR to PS after being cut and clearing waivers? Who the neck knows why exactly GB made the claim for Zettel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquatch Posted September 8, 2018 Author Share Posted September 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, squire12 said: Maybe the Zettel claim was to add another player to the DL and bump Lowry down a notch? Maybe the Zettel claim was to add another player overall to the D rotation and allow some more variability in combinations for game day actives vs various teams and would allow GB to move a WR to PS after being cut and clearing waivers? Who the neck knows why exactly GB made the claim for Zettel. Exactly, and your guess is as good as any I’ve heard. Would’ve liked to see it play out actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 10 hours ago, incognito_man said: This is why Twitter sucks. Nobody can deduce anything from that tweet. It's spin from a frickin clickbait journalist. If I chopped quotes and ended them with ellipses I can make anything sound like anything too... True but it's been well documented how those guys, at least Matthews, feel about the EDGE depth. Earlier this year he basically said straight out the depth "isn't that good" or something to that effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 11 hours ago, AlexGreen#20 said: I'll be honest. I'm not even entirely ready to write Fackrell off as a guy that can get pressure. I don't think he will, but stranger things have happened than a guy having the light go on in his third year. I know he's practically ancient, but he does offer you something and I do think you move him into that Inside/Outside hybrid role, if (when) Clay goes down. He's a decent enough backup in that spot. Personally, i truly believe the guy is just too "soft" in the sense he doesn't have the temperament for EDGE. To effectively play that position you either need to be a good athlete like Matthews, have dominant power (like Perry's game) or you at least need to be a mean SOB. Fackrell doesn't have the better than average physical traits and he just doesn't have that temperament. I thought it spoke volumes when Moss basically called him out last year for essentially what I'm talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 Obviously all our third tier players should be cut immediately and set on fire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 2 hours ago, packfanfb said: True but it's been well documented how those guys, at least Matthews, feel about the EDGE depth. Earlier this year he basically said straight out the depth "isn't that good" or something to that effect. I don't believe you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 46 minutes ago, incognito_man said: I don't believe you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 8, 2018 Share Posted September 8, 2018 55 minutes ago, incognito_man said: I don't believe you. I wouldn't believe me either. https://amp.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000934651/article/clay-matthews-packers-olb-depth-not-that-great?networkId=4595&site=.news&zone=story&zoneUrl=url%3Dstory&zoneKeys=s1%3Dstory&env&pageKeyValues=prtnr%3Daround-the-league%3Bteam%3Dgb%3Bconf%3Dnfc%3Bdvsn%3Dncn%3Bplyr%3Dkenneth_clark%3Bplyr%3Dnicholas_perry%3Bplyr%3Dmuhammad_wilkerson&p.ct=Around the NFL&p.adsm=false&p.tcm=%23fff&p.bgc1m=%230964bf&p.bgc2m=%23053a74&sr=amp Also I have no idea why this URL is so long.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.