CWood21 Posted April 27, 2018 Author Share Posted April 27, 2018 3 minutes ago, JBURGE25 said: I would love to see us move up to the end of the 1st for Landry or Carter. Even Taven Bryan Don't recall who cited it, but they send Landry was going to tumble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, ChaRisMa said: You said something that made me go look at just how easy it'd be to get into the 3rd: If you are talking top of the third, it isn't happening... We'd have to trade away all our value after pick 45. If you are talking mid/late 3rd, we can pull that off. Yeah, I was thinking pick 85 on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWhitehurst Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 I wouldn't be surprised if we picked at least 2 more CB's with all the picks we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Quote Both the Jimmy Johnson chart and our AV-based draft calculator agree: the Packers absolutely won that trade with the Saints in terms of value. The picks Green Bay received were worth an expected AV of 11.6 and only had to give up a pick (No. 14) worth 5.5 expected AV to land that package. Quote After fleecing the Saints in an earlier trade (per ESPN's draft pick value calculator), the Packers threw back some of that value to move back up to 18 in a deal with the Seahawks. Green Bay traded picks worth 8.3 expected AV for selections worth 5.8 in this one. The Packers still came out ahead after the two trades combined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 That's a great pick by the Pats. My fav OL in the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, JBURGE25 said: That's a great pick by the Pats. My fav OL in the draft His measurables remind me of Tauscher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lodestar Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Anyone’s know what would it take to move up from 45 to get Landry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBitzMan Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 36 minutes ago, CWood21 said: I'll admit I was wrong. Didn't think he'd be on the Packers board because of the height. I was very wrong as well. Gute isn’t Ted after all, who knew? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, ChaRisMa said: You said something that made me go look at just how easy it'd be to get into the 3rd: If you are talking top of the third, it isn't happening... We'd have to trade away all our value after pick 45. If you are talking mid/late 3rd, we can pull that off. Isn't the top of the 4th like the end of the 3rd? Why trade up into the third? Here's where the Randall trade starts to pay off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWhitehurst Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, CWood21 said: Don't recall who cited it, but they send Landry was going to tumble. He should tumble. Many like myself got enamored initially by his great bend around the edge, before then proceeding to do the rarity of WATCHING FILM (!) in addition to sucking at the teet of draft punditry, and lo and behold, we see him getting rag-dolled and pummeled trying to set/stack the edge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 My computer crashed due to overheating shortly after we traded down. It can't handle video very well lol. If we thought Randall was hollywood then Alexander is definitely hollywood judging from his cringy performance on stage. I guess the Packers like their cornerbacks with some swagger. I don't love the pick but I can understand it. I don't think he is a candidate for our star position though but might still address that in the later rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 So trading up was clearly a bad idea... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 27, 2018 Author Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, TheBitzMan said: I was very wrong as well. Gute isn’t Ted after all, who knew? I mean, it wasn't a huge treshold difference. We're talking about 2/12 of an inch I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodjahs12 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Lodestar said: Anyone’s know what would it take to move up from 45 to get Landry? I’m not convinced you’ll have to trade up to get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBitzMan Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.