Jump to content

USMC's "Dirty Dozen" Dynasty League (Discussion Thread)


USMC_PackFan

Recommended Posts

Check In Status as of now:

 

Edited by USMC_PackFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardly feels like my team anymore.

 

But I won’t quit on my first league. Let’s do it. Very pressed for time these days so apologies in advance if my absence/tardiness impacts the league. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, USMC_PackFan said:

Check In Status as of now:

 

Now that everyone has checked in, trading is now open!

Will give it a week or so & we can start drafting. 

Let me know if this works for everyone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, chisoxguy7 said:

Would prefer it be put to a vote, and, if successful, would not take effect for this season. That’s the kind of thing that affects roster construction, and allowing time to make moves in anticipation of such a change should be allowed.

Agreed. Like when we were going to reduce return yardage and I'm over here with Darren Sproles like "Please God dont change the rule! he's the only Top-20 back i got" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/29/2018 at 9:42 PM, sammymvpknight said:

I didn’t watch a game last year...it was liberating. 

WOW!! that would be hard to do as I'm a season Tk holder.

Although, I've been trying to watch a full Det. Tigers baseball game this year and haven't had the time to do it at this point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, chisoxguy7 said:

Would prefer it be put to a vote, and, if successful, would not take effect for this season. That’s the kind of thing that affects roster construction, and allowing time to make moves in anticipation of such a change should be allowed.

I put the question out there for feedback a few days ago (page 26) & have a few folks that have already given their thoughts.  We would obviously go with majority in the end.

As far as roster construction goes, that's no big deal at all IMO.  All it would do is add (1) more round to our rookie drafts and wouldn't require much more prep work from an individual team perspective since there would be no change in the amount of keepers or scoring format.

Edited by USMC_PackFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, USMC_PackFan said:

I put the question out there for feedback a few days ago (page 26) & have a few folks that have already given their thoughts.  We would obviously go with majority in the end.

As far as roster construction goes, that's no big deal at all IMO.  All it would do is add (1) more round to our rookie drafts and wouldn't require much more prep work from an individual team perspective since there would be no change in the amount of keepers or scoring format.

It helps the teams that are currently deeper. I doubt that it would have affected strategy too much, especially if it’s a flex spot and not a RB or WR spot. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...