Malfatron Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 oh come on, stupid ravens. that was a lulzy pick and bengals implosion that wasnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
megatechpc Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 7 hours ago, NFLExpert49 said: Nathan Peterman may be the worst QB to ever play professional football when you consider the era. He is unfathomably bad. That's not an overreaction though. He's just that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenos Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 On September 9, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Boltstrikes said: Hard to have talent when you can’t keep a first round pick on the field... Fun fact Chargers have give a second contract to two first round picks since 2005. Anyone that says they have a “talented” team is talking out the wrong end. 2/12... garbage A little misleading to say the least with the 2005 comment. Yeah it sucks that we didn't keep as many 1st rounder as we should have. But guess what? Gates, Hardwick, Weddle, Scifres, Shaun Phillips, Jamal Williams, Keenan Allen were not 1st round picks. Now do a comparison of the Chargers with other teams with regards to 1st round picks since 2005. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenos Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Overreaction: for every Rivers thrown TD, there will be an equal amount that is dropped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmittyBacall Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 5 minutes ago, Xenos said: Overreaction: for every Rivers thrown TD, there will be an equal amount that is dropped. Holy hell. A couple of those could be argued as barely overthrown but Jesus, catch the ball guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenos Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Just now, SmittyBacall said: Holy hell. A couple of those could be argued as barely overthrown but Jesus, catch the ball guys. For all the horrible mistakes that happened last Sunday, we could have still won if the receivers had caught those crucial passes. Rivers should have had 5 TDs and over 500 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theJ Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 10 minutes ago, Xenos said: Overreaction: for every Rivers thrown TD, there will be an equal amount that is dropped. 4 minutes ago, SmittyBacall said: Holy hell. A couple of those could be argued as barely overthrown but Jesus, catch the ball guys. Yeah i think i'd say the first two were definite overthrows. The miss to Williams on the 3rd throw was a bad throw, but catchable. The last two were bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenos Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 42 minutes ago, theJ said: Yeah i think i'd say the first two were definite overthrows. The miss to Williams on the 3rd throw was a bad throw, but catchable. The last two were bad. The first two were catchable as well IMO. If it's inches from your fingertips, you should be able to catch it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakuvious Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 59 minutes ago, Xenos said: The first two were catchable as well IMO. If it's inches from your fingertips, you should be able to catch it. Catchable does not mean the same thing as dropped, though. If they had to lay out in order to get it it was still overthrown. #1 and #2 were overthrows, that the receivers may have been able to catch, but they were overthrows and not drops. #3 and #5 were pure drops. #4 was actually underthrown, though still dropped. The underthrow kept it from being a potential TD, and let Parker get to the WR. Also, #2 and #3 occurred on the same drive, that ended in a TD anyway. Only the first one made a big difference and that was more an overthrow than a drop. But, I digress. In the end, the blame was really pretty split. 2 were inaccurate passes, 2 were pure drops, with 1 play being a bit of both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted September 16, 2018 Share Posted September 16, 2018 On 9/10/2018 at 11:24 AM, ramssuperbowl99 said: You are obviously missing the plan here. Last year: 0-16-0 This year: 0-0-16 Next year: 16-0-0 On 9/10/2018 at 11:48 AM, ramssuperbowl99 said: The Browns realize that their winning percentage determines a draft pick, and the only way to beat out a winning percentage of 0 is to have a winning percentage that is undefined. The 0-0-16 is actually a higher form of tanking than last year. Oh look at that. NFL Gen gets an elite prediction and it's dismissed. @MWil23 get in this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted September 16, 2018 Share Posted September 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, ramssuperbowl99 said: Oh look at that. NFL Gen gets an elite prediction and it's dismissed. @MWil23 get in this thread. LOL Zane Gonzalez. Enough said. He shouldn’t take the plane back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted September 16, 2018 Share Posted September 16, 2018 Just now, MWil23 said: LOL Zane Gonzalez. Enough said. He shouldn’t take the plane back. So even though they lost, the clearly went for the tie. They tried to shoot the moon for 0-0-16, and look, they'll still end up among the stars (like 0-8-8 tbh). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted September 16, 2018 Share Posted September 16, 2018 Just now, ramssuperbowl99 said: So even though they lost, the clearly went for the tie. They tried to shoot the moon for 0-0-16, and look, they'll still end up among the stars (like 0-8-8 tbh). I’m just happy they’re competitive this year, but I bet somehow that take will get blown out of context since this is NFL General. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted September 16, 2018 Share Posted September 16, 2018 1 minute ago, MWil23 said: I’m just happy they’re competitive this year, but I bet somehow that take will get blown out of context since this is NFL General. Obviously you can't say they are almost winning games and you're happy that they're losing close until after they've won a game dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted September 16, 2018 Share Posted September 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, ramssuperbowl99 said: Obviously you can't say they are almost winning games and you're happy that they're losing close until after they've won a game dude. Correct. I obviously shouldn’t be optimistic that 2 games into the season they’re already more competitive than all of last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.