Packerraymond Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said: I mean they *could* have had any QB in the draft except Mayfield last year, but they had to take the running back for some darn fool reason. Can't argue that, Murray would be a potentially rejuvenating player to build a franchise around though. Remember the buzz around RGIII? Imagine if he sustained that (I think he could have had the Redskins not grossly mismanaged him.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Just now, Dubz41 said: 4 minutes ago, JBURGE said: John Dorsey is a ******* legend Stop. He is living off of the sacrifice of Sasha Smith. Smith wasn't adept at scouting, but he filled the cupboard with an incredible amount of draft capital that is the underlying Dorksy is looking so good right now. Wait until OBJ and Landry start complaining about Mayfield and they find out Kitchens isn't the guy to lead this manic boat. The Odell trade has nothing to do with Sashi. Yes he had an extra 1st round pick last year. He also built KC to what they are today. You stop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Man, just when I thought the Browns were making the right decisions. This was a stupid move. Don't care how good he is, some receivers just aren't worth having on your team, and I think OBJ is in that territory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubz41 Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, JBURGE said: The Odell trade has nothing to do with Sashi. Yes he had an extra 1st round pick last year. He also built KC to what they are today. You stop And was shown the door?!? Dark things in Dorsey's closet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Peter King: I think the fair question to Dave Gettleman is this: Is a mid-1, a 3, and PFF’s 16th-rated safety “blowing you away” for the best player on your team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: Can't argue that, Murray would be a potentially rejuvenating player to build a franchise around though. Remember the buzz around RGIII? Imagine if he sustained that (I think he could have had the Redskins not grossly mismanaged him.) I mean, the biggest problem is that barring a miracle their current best player (Saquon) is going to be either gone or prohibitively expensive at a non-premium position by the time they are ready to compete for anything. If they had just taken the Notre Dame guard, you can actually keep high quality offensive linemen on bad teams for the long haul (Joe Thomas played for the Browns for a decade.) Literally any defensible pick at #2 last year would have been better than Barkley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 4 minutes ago, Chili said: Beckham with our #1.12, #3.12, and give up Spriggs or Mike Daniels Would you do it? No the guy is an ******* and destroyed one locker room why give him a chance to ruin another one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: Man, just when I thought the Browns were making the right decisions. This was a stupid move. Don't care how good he is, some receivers just aren't worth having on your team, and I think OBJ is in that territory. OH MY GOD! We have found common ground! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 1 minute ago, PossibleCabbage said: I mean, the biggest problem is that barring a miracle their current best player (Saquon) is going to be either gone or prohibitively expensive at a non-premium position by the time they are ready to compete for anything. If they had just taken the Notre Dame guard, you can actually keep high quality offensive linemen on bad teams for the long haul (Joe Thomas played for the Browns for a decade.) Literally any defensible pick at #2 last year would have been better than Barkley. Opposing DCs: "Okay guys, we're playing Saquon this week. Single high....ten men in the box" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 6 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said: I mean, the biggest problem is that barring a miracle their current best player (Saquon) is going to be either gone or prohibitively expensive at a non-premium position by the time they are ready to compete for anything. If they had just taken the Notre Dame guard, you can actually keep high quality offensive linemen on bad teams for the long haul (Joe Thomas played for the Browns for a decade.) Literally any defensible pick at #2 last year would have been better than Barkley. The Giants have been fighting the inevitable for a while now. That's what happens when you have a QB that wants to stick around 3 years too long. They wanted to try to do right by Manning and it's costing them half a decade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Ian Rapoport: The trade is essentially agreed to — Ford for a 2020 2nd round pick. That assumes the #49ers get a deal done with Ford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 Just now, Leader said: Ian Rapoport: The trade is essentially agreed to — Ford for a 2020 2nd round pick. That assumes the #49ers get a deal done with Ford. gross. I would easily give 2020 2nd and pay Ford 18m over Zadarius Smith at 16.5m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 1 hour ago, cannondale said: The Giants have been fighting the inevitable for a while now. That's what happens when you have a QB that wants to stick around 3 years too long. They wanted to try to do right by Manning and it's costing them half a decade And McAdoo was the bad guy. Giants couldnt see the forest for the trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 If this ends up being Earl... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted March 13, 2019 Share Posted March 13, 2019 4 minutes ago, cannondale said: The Giants have been fighting the inevitable for a while now. That's what happens when you have a QB that wants to stick around 3 years too long. They wanted to try to do right by Manning and it's costing them half a decade Slight rephrase.... Thats what happens when you have an organization that doesnt have the guts to move on from their over the hill franchise QB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.