Scoundrel Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 Oh nevermind I guess he is considered locked since he was a RFA signing this past off-season? So I can not extend him in season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheltzbahr Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Counselor said: I have a question for the contract guys. Andy Janovich just signed an extension. If I 100% match the irl salary does that boost his salary this season or the next three years? It’s a three year extension. Or do we average out the total contract money over the next four years? I can look at this for you. Dont believe anything MD4L, SirA, PR or bcb tell you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 3 hours ago, Counselor said: Oh nevermind I guess he is considered locked since he was a RFA signing this past off-season? So I can not extend him in season? Locked players have to wait. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 I still don't get why we removed the 5 year deals for 1st round picks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheltzbahr Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 7 minutes ago, WFLukic said: I still don't get why we removed the 5 year deals for 1st round picks. I think the thought process was that we will follow teams who exercise 5th year options IRL, therefore every player will match their 2nd contracts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 21 minutes ago, PR said: Locked players have to wait. So I’d have to 3up him then right? Because he will be a FA for me and I can’t irl extend him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 I think not being able to give locked players IRL 100% extensions is pointless and is something I would like to vote on changing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 I’d be paying him more than a 3up would cost so don’t see how it would give me a competitive advantage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 31 minutes ago, WFLukic said: I still don't get why we removed the 5 year deals for 1st round picks. Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted October 12, 2019 Author Share Posted October 12, 2019 40 minutes ago, WFLukic said: I still don't get why we removed the 5 year deals for 1st round picks. Because like pheltz' said we ran into contract issues where they didn't match up. Some NFL teams wouldn't pick up the 5th year. But we give the BDL owner the option to pick it up if the NFL team does. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 17 minutes ago, Counselor said: I think not being able to give locked players IRL 100% extensions is pointless and is something I would like to vote on changing That's to prevent you from locking up every player and keeping them out of FA. Plus locked players generally are either RFAs, players you signed, rookies, waivers etc. meaning you have ways to retain them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 1 minute ago, SwoleXmad said: That's to prevent you from locking up every player and keeping them out of FA. Plus locked players generally are either RFAs, players you signed, rookies, waivers etc. meaning you have ways to retain them. No I don’t have a way to retain him without a 3up based on those rules. He is already a RFA. I don’t see how a bunch of people can lock up free agents and pay them 100 percent of their irl contracts. That’s a flawed fear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 54 minutes ago, Counselor said: No I don’t have a way to retain him without a 3up based on those rules. He is already a RFA. I don’t see how a bunch of people can lock up free agents and pay them 100 percent of their irl contracts. That’s a flawed fear. But it dampens the FA pool, you want to keep him? You have a way to retain him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 47 minutes ago, SwoleXmad said: But it dampens the FA pool, you want to keep him? You have a way to retain him. It also lowers the amount of competition for players in the pool. I get why it’s there but I don’t agree with it on RFA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WFLukic Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 You can 100% him in the offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts