MD4L Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 39 minutes ago, Jlash said: Man I never get modhood anywhere I go Congrats Rags I guess. They think he’s a great mafia player here for some reason too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 9 minutes ago, Counselor said: They are all one year deals starting at 501 I believe. But can go as high as a bid goes Rookies start at $350. I think veterans is $450 but fact check is needed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, MD4L said: Rookies start at $350. I think veterans is $450 but fact check is needed. Oh ok thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 I want to approach this in the most non confrontational way, but this is something I cannot let sit. I would like transparency in the goings on of the trade and ruling committees. I have requested this before and I do not believe it to be an unreasonable request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 16 minutes ago, Whicker said: I want to approach this in the most non confrontational way, but this is something I cannot let sit. I would like transparency in the goings on of the trade and ruling committees. I have requested this before and I do not believe it to be an unreasonable request. It looks like your trades are going through fine what's up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 18 minutes ago, Jlash said: It looks like your trades are going through fine what's up? The first one had a disapproval. I just believe that any non-approval must at least provide reasoning. Otherwise why even post? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Whicker said: The first one had a disapproval. I just believe that any non-approval must at least provide reasoning. Otherwise why even post? I mean, i think point is fair. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, Whicker said: The first one had a disapproval. I just believe that any non-approval must at least provide reasoning. Otherwise why even post? 3 minutes ago, wwhickok said: I mean, i think point is fair. I don't disagree. Anytime I didn't approve a deal I stated why. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheltzbahr Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 44 minutes ago, Whicker said: I want to approach this in the most non confrontational way, but this is something I cannot let sit. I would like transparency in the goings on of the trade and ruling committees. I have requested this before and I do not believe it to be an unreasonable request. All discussion as far as I am concerned is conducted in the negotiation thread. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Whicker said: I want to approach this in the most non confrontational way, but this is something I cannot let sit. I would like transparency in the goings on of the trade and ruling committees. I have requested this before and I do not believe it to be an unreasonable request. Transparsnecy on my part: I don't talk to anyone and I decide on my own lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 27 minutes ago, Whicker said: The first one had a disapproval. I just believe that any non-approval must at least provide reasoning. Otherwise why even post? I agree with this proposal. I didn't know this was a commonality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Looking for a #2 WR. Hit me up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 2 hours ago, Whicker said: The first one had a disapproval. I just believe that any non-approval must at least provide reasoning. Otherwise why even post? Because I can post what I want when I want? If I want to give another council member the opportunity to be the hammer on your trade why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 I won’t be the hammer on anything involving you ever again Whicker. Good or bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 This is an absolutely dangerous precedent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts