MD4L Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 I can support something like this but I would prefer it not implemented immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 i'm in if it's only for picks and not for players i don't want people salary dumping for PFA picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 Nope. I don't like change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 Yes 6b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 2 hours ago, bcb1213 said: i'm in if it's only for picks and not for players i don't want people salary dumping for PFA picks How is that different from dumping them for 6th rounders? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 2 hours ago, MD4L said: I can support something like this but I would prefer it not implemented immediately. I disagree. I feel like a test run of the draft style and trades is necessary before we can know anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 I really don't see the opposition to this. If the test run goes badly then we reconsider. I think y'all are afraid of monsters under the bed if you think something league changing is going to happen. No one is going to get drunk and trade Mahomes for a couple of PFA picks. And if someone sheds a bad contract then oh no how can we ever recover? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 I think that keeping all rounds the same in terms of timing is a good idea for this year. But, I really do think that treating PFA as essentially 'draft part deux' where we 1. make picks in order, not a block and 2. can trade those picks will make the entire process much more enjoyable for everyone. Plus, those are minimal changes that we can revisit this summer to see if we like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 13 minutes ago, Whicker said: No one is going to get drunk and trade Mahomes for a couple of PFA picks. But if they did, it would be approved by the majority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 7, 2019 Author Share Posted March 7, 2019 23 minutes ago, Whicker said: I really don't see the opposition to this. If the test run goes badly then we reconsider. I think y'all are afraid of monsters under the bed if you think something league changing is going to happen. No one is going to get drunk and trade Mahomes for a couple of PFA picks. And if someone sheds a bad contract then oh no how can we ever recover? You really can't accuse me of that given the amount of proposals I made during this meeting. I just think trading PFA picks is not natural. I don't think it would be a terrible thing, but I just don't believe it's suppose to work that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 Just now, TedLavie said: You really can't accuse me of that given the amount of proposals I made during this meeting. I just think trading PFA picks is not natural. I don't think it would be a terrible thing, but I just don't believe it's suppose to work that way. My point is that I think we get rid of the 'PFA' mindset and just treat it is 'draft part deux'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedLavie Posted March 7, 2019 Author Share Posted March 7, 2019 Just now, Ragnarok said: My point is that I think we get rid of the 'PFA' mindset and just treat it is 'draft part deux'. Yes I get that. Am I allowed to not want it though? I just like PFA and I like having picks that you can't speculate on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted March 7, 2019 Share Posted March 7, 2019 Just now, TedLavie said: Yes I get that. Am I allowed to not want it though? I just like PFA and I like having picks that you can't speculate on. Fair enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 49 minutes ago, Whicker said: I disagree. I feel like a test run of the draft style and trades is necessary before we can know anything Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted March 8, 2019 Share Posted March 8, 2019 No on 6b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.