Jump to content

It Mafia - The Losers have won, Derry is saved!


rackcs

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, MWil23 said:

I think that Matts is going all in on a Day 1 bluff and trying to beat everyone to the punch by posting his fake claim via quoting Rack (hence my vote on him). It's aggressive, but believable and he's hoping to buy himself some time...throw in his power and it's not generally a Town aligned one.

\You are forgetting rule #1. Matts only lolclear attempts as a civ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MWil23 said:

Ok, here are my honest thoughts and observations:

I think that Counselor and Dome are loser aligned masons.

I think that BCB is also loser aligned.

I think that Matts is going all in on a Day 1 bluff and trying to beat everyone to the punch by posting his fake claim via quoting Rack (hence my vote on him). It's aggressive, but believable and he's hoping to buy himself some time...throw in his power and it's not generally a Town aligned one.

I think that it's hilarious making SwAg angry on Day 1, and judging from his response(s), he's probably Town...wrong, but Town nonetheless. 

I think that Orca has refused to look at anyone outside of me for the last 4 games now (on Day 1/2) and it's hilarious. 

I think that Malf going from "strong town read" on me to "I think that he's scum" to "I'm not sure whether he is or not" on me is interesting, considering I didn't really post much from his first reaction to his last.

I have yet to really get a read on just about anyone else.

Just so you know, you still didn’t articulate an actionable read.  Is this you saying you’ll vote for anyone you don’t have a Town read on, or is “hilarious”?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SwAg said:

Just so you know, you still didn’t articulate an actionable read.  Is this you saying you’ll vote for anyone you don’t have a Town read on, or is “hilarious”?

I was about to respond to this, but then...

 

1 minute ago, SwAg said:

Never mind, I misread the last section on matts as equivocation.

Hopefully we are on the same page now. If not, I'll try to explain myself more clearly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...