Jump to content

Week 4: Redskins (0-3) vs. Giants (1-2): Sunday 1 pm


MikeT14

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Counselor said:

So y’all gonna fire Gruden now or what?

On one hand, it would be nice.

On the other, who would replace him and what does it matter?

 

 

Larry and Cooley thought strongly about making Tress Way the game MVP, but went with Quinton Dunbar because making the punter the MVP "would be disrespectful."

No, not acknowledging the only Pro Bowl nod they will have was the best player is disrespectful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, e16bball said:

Why? Ready to play now =/= best in the long term. 

Lots of guys (Andy Dalton is always the prime example I think of) are ready to come in and play competently early on. They have tons of experience and have a headstart on being able to keep up mentally at this level. Guys like Minshew and Finley from last draft class sorta fit this mold, and so does Daniel Jones to some degree (though he’s got more physical talent than the rest of those guys).

But that doesn’t make those guys the best long-term option. They don’t have much upside. Picking a QB is not about the immediate return — it’s about the payoff you receive over the next 10-15 years. The investment in Haskins was one in his long-term projection. His physical tools that give him the potential to be great if/when he learns how to play QB at this level. The same can’t be said for most of the guys who may have been ready to play earlier, they have a physical ceiling that Haskins doesn’t.

Unfortunately, impatience has placed him on the field well before that time came, so we’ll see if he can overcome being thrown in there.

Because I don’t think project QBs with 14 college starts are worth first round picks. It’s too high of a risk, there has to be a discount for that lack of experience.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Woz said:

On one hand, it would be nice.

On the other, who would replace him and what does it matter?

 

 

Larry and Cooley thought strongly about making Tress Way the game MVP, but went with Quinton Dunbar because making the punter the MVP "would be disrespectful."

No, not acknowledging the only Pro Bowl nod they will have was the best player is disrespectful.

Having to listen to Larry Michael on Redskins radio is disrespectful for all Redskins fans.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Woz said:

On one hand, it would be nice.

On the other, who would replace him and what does it matter?

 

 

Larry and Cooley thought strongly about making Tress Way the game MVP, but went with Quinton Dunbar because making the punter the MVP "would be disrespectful."

No, not acknowledging the only Pro Bowl nod they will have was the best player is disrespectful.

Firing Gruden now would put all the pressure on Bruce so I’m all for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MKnight82 said:

Because I don’t think project QBs with 14 college starts are worth first round picks. It’s too high of a risk, there has to be a discount for that lack of experience.  

There was, he didn’t go 1st in the NFL draft despite him having the best arm and most natural talent, he was instead the 3rd QB taken and fell 14 spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, e16bball said:

Why? Ready to play now =/= best in the long term. 

Lots of guys (Andy Dalton is always the prime example I think of) are ready to come in and play competently early on. They have tons of experience and have a headstart on being able to keep up mentally at this level. Guys like Minshew and Finley from last draft class sorta fit this mold, and so does Daniel Jones to some degree (though he’s got more physical talent than the rest of those guys).

But that doesn’t make those guys the best long-term option. They don’t have much upside. Picking a QB is not about the immediate return — it’s about the payoff you receive over the next 10-15 years. The investment in Haskins was one in his long-term projection. His physical tools that give him the potential to be great if/when he learns how to play QB at this level. The same can’t be said for most of the guys who may have been ready to play earlier, they have a physical ceiling that Haskins doesn’t.

Unfortunately, impatience has placed him on the field well before that time came, so we’ll see if he can overcome being thrown in there.

Most Fans here don't understand this because they dont know what it's like to win consistently or build a winning franchise.

Andy Reid traded up for Mahomes thinking about the future. Reid also sat Mahomes his rookie year except week 17 thinking about the future.

Here Haskins is thrown in to "Win Now" around nothing but incompetence and dysfunction! So all those who wanted him to start don't say **** about his 3 INTs, footwork, over throws, ect. You got what you asked for!

Edited by Skins212689
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...