Spartica4Real Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, utley4568 said: Boogie for Kyrie I completely doubt it. Boogie is the better player, and we actually have a good shot at re-signing him while we wouldn't with Kyrie. Plus Kyrie doesn't want to get overshadowed apparently and that's exactly what would happen under AD. If we're involved in the trade it's gotta be as the 3rd team, unless of course you could get Kyrie without giving up Boogie but... you can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utley Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 1 minute ago, jfinley88 said: i wonder if that notifies kiltman every time you make a post Part of me hopes it does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Just now, utley4568 said: Part of me hopes it does @Kiltman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Utley Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 1 minute ago, Spartica4Real said: I completely doubt it. Boogie is the better player, and we actually have a good shot at re-signing him while we wouldn't with Kyrie. Plus Kyrie doesn't want to get overshadowed apparently and that's exactly what would happen under AD. What makes you say they have a good shot of re-signing him? And Kyrie would have full control of the offense in New Orleans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catcheryea Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 lmao windhorst trying to defend himself on the lowe post after kyrie basically called him lebron's errand boy is sooooooo funny to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiltman Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 1 hour ago, jfinley88 said: 1 hour ago, utley4568 said: Part of me hopes it does @Kiltman Get it? Cause I'm like Cory (but only dead on the inside) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coors Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 16 hours ago, TheRealMcCoy said: That's terrible news. I've always enjoyed watching him play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coors Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 I saw Adam Silver say that Seattle would be "on the short list" of cities for possible expansion. Other than Seattle, what other cities do you guys feel would be on that list? I've always though Nashville would be a good city to carry an NBA franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
champ11 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 So I actually think the Allen Crabbe move was bad for the Nets. What do you guys think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raves Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 24 minutes ago, champ11 said: So I actually think the Allen Crabbe move was bad for the Nets. What do you guys think Depends on if you think the Nets could attract free agents. Doesn't seem like they are a prime target right now, so they're willing to accept some meh contracts with decent players to provide something worth watching on the court. I mean the team doesn't look too bad. Could possibly compete for a playoff spot in the east, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DalCowboyzRule Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 2 hours ago, coors said: 18 hours ago, TheRealMcCoy said: That's terrible news. I've always enjoyed watching him play. Said no one ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coors Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 1 hour ago, DalCowboyzRule said: Said no one ever. When I was going to school in Athens, I saw him play in person against UGA and for some reason I've just always been a fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 2 hours ago, champ11 said: So I actually think the Allen Crabbe move was bad for the Nets. What do you guys think i mean yeah ignoring the "trade", they just basically gave crabbe 3/~57 in a market where that's not even seen as reasonable anymore. i dont get how they didn't get value for taking on that contract especially considering the financial landscape among teams for next offseason. was a misstep for them iyam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
champ11 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 25 minutes ago, jfinley88 said: i mean yeah ignoring the "trade", they just basically gave crabbe 3/~57 in a market where that's not even seen as reasonable anymore. i dont get how they didn't get value for taking on that contract especially considering the financial landscape among teams for next offseason. was a misstep for them iyam. yeah he's frankly a very meh player and i understand that they got better, but i think that cap space was more valuable despite the fact that they aren't a FA destination. Felt like the Carroll deal wasn't great either even though they are doing what they can and I respect that. I'm upset they saved Portland from their own stupidity for free pretty much. I'm sure the league is not happy with them for letting that squad outta the luxury tax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, champ11 said: yeah he's frankly a very meh player and i understand that they got better, but i think that cap space was more valuable despite the fact that they aren't a FA destination. Felt like the Carroll deal wasn't great either even though they are doing what they can and I respect that. I'm upset they saved Portland from their own stupidity for free pretty much. I'm sure the league is not happy with them for letting that squad outta the luxury tax Could've been like one of a few teams w/ money to throw at guys and they're getting rid of that opportunity for like nothing. At least w/ Carroll they got picks, they just erased 18m in cap space for a real solid bench guy. I was alright w/ Carroll, but w/o getting any additional value makes it way harder to justify these kind of moves as good ones. If we're being real, Crabbe (in the current climate) is a ~8m guy? Probably would've got something like that this offseason? Why you would take on ~18m for 3 years w/ no added value in that deal? Banana's iyam. But yeah like you're saying, kudos to PRX for bailing themselves out on part of the top 3 silly offseason's in the last 5 years. That sentence probably doesn't make sense, but f it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.