theuntouchable Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 Also, I am disappoint you didn’t try to display my meta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 3 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: When you break it down, it’s not anywhere near as insane as you think. Malf is a player that is generally targeted often and early. I think there are 3 possible scenarios for what has taken place. 1. Josh is scum and killed Malf. 2. Josh is scum and roleblocked Malf in case he was protector. 3. josh is town and was redirected to Malf by scum. 1, IMO, is most likely scenario tho he does seem to be telling the truth about not killing Malf. If he didn’t kill Malf, then there must be some form of a role that hid the killer. both 2 and 3 are equally plausible scenarios as the other. It’s not too far fetched to think that scum figured Malf stood a good chance at being watched and redirected a town a player to him to pin the death on that player. Ninja hit on Malf with a redirect of a town player to a likely watched target that is killed is a fairly plausible set of moves IMO 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 3 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Also, I am disappoint you didn’t try to display my meta. You are town when you threaten to kick other players in the shins. I don't recall it this game thus far......hmmmmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 14 minutes ago, Matts4313 said: ET - be a doll and put your "move 1" on mwil. Will you at least read the results?? In case you get a return PM? Yeah, not checking my role PM. If I get another PM, then...well, I won't read that either. Or, I will read it. I don't know, we'll see. 12 minutes ago, MWil23 said: @ET80 don't listen to Matts. Also, I don't care what the majority of you think. Also, I think that Squire is scum. Well, now I'm confused. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 1 minute ago, theuntouchable said: When you break it down, it’s not anywhere near as insane as you think. Malf is a player that is generally targeted often and early. I think there are 3 possible scenarios for what has taken place. 1. Josh is scum and killed Malf. 2. Josh is scum and roleblocked Malf in case he was protector. 3. josh is town and was redirected to Malf by scum. 1, IMO, is most likely scenario tho he does seem to be telling the truth about not killing Malf. If he didn’t kill Malf, then there must be some form of a role that hid the killer. both 2 and 3 are equally plausible scenarios as the other. It’s not too far fetched to think that scum figured Malf stood a good chance at being watched and redirected a town a player to him to pin the death on that player. Just now, squire12 said: @Matts4313 Why would mafia not use 2 moves on Malf? It set up a really good lynch for D2. Look at how some were pushing to get a hammer on Josh? To both of you: They would have to assume the following: 1. There would be a watcher with a move day 1. 2. That the watcher would watch malf 3. That malf wouldnt have any way to stop the hit. 4. That there isnt a tracker, investigation, BG, etc to "muddy" their plant (Josh) w/a lot of names. 5. That Josh would have a move, on day one, that can be redirected. And after doing **ALL OF THAT** and it working, all they have to show for it is killing Malf D1 and framing Josh D2. The same Josh who has a bad civ role (if all that is true). It would be idiotic, imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 5 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Also, I am disappoint you didn’t try to display my meta. You are in the game. I only gave @JoshstraDaymus his. He asked why I always try to kill him. I am not actually trying to kill him, I am testing him for reactions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 Matts is scum LOL. He’s been fishing for roles and pushing for a hammer for over a day now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 2 minutes ago, squire12 said: You are town when you threaten to kick other players in the shins. I don't recall it this game thus far......hmmmmm Thats not true and you know it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 3 minutes ago, MWil23 said: Matts is scum LOL. He’s been fishing for roles and pushing for a hammer for over a day now. Effin A. Solid argument. Built on a strong rock foundation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWil23 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 We will find out tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 2 minutes ago, Matts4313 said: To both of you: They would have to assume the following: 1. There would be a watcher with a move day 1. 2. That the watcher would watch malf 3. That malf wouldnt have any way to stop the hit. 4. That there isnt a tracker, investigation, BG, etc to "muddy" their plant (Josh) w/a lot of names. 5. That Josh would have a move, on day one, that can be redirected. And after doing **ALL OF THAT** and it working, all they have to show for it is killing Malf D1 and framing Josh D2. The same Josh who has a bad civ role (if all that is true). It would be idiotic, imo 1. They wouldn’t actually have to assume this. They could also view it as josh potentially coming out and saying he was redirected to malf without a watcher, and work from there. Josh is an inexperienced player that has been caught in claims previously. 2. I think we can all agree that a large number of players would want malf dead d1. I can only think of maybe 3 of us in this game that wouldn’t at least consider it. That being said, the most likely choice for a watch would be malf, regardless. 3. That risk would be the same regardless of who they chose. 4. Again, that risk would be the same. 5. Are you suggesting that if they do actually have a redirect that they shouldn’t use it d1 because that player may not have a move? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Thats not true and you know it. why so defensive? you know I am joking with you right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLadd Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 Just now, MWil23 said: We will find out tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 Just now, squire12 said: why so defensive? you know I am joking with you right? You are the one player that I have a difficult time deciphering when you are and are not being sarcastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 2 minutes ago, MWil23 said: We will find out tonight so you are putting out there that you have a role and are now a likely hit target. If you have info that can incriminate scum, don't risk it dying with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.