Ragnarok Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 1 minute ago, Matts4313 said: Not really, he already explained why he is doing it: I don't even think Swag is scum right now. He has just has moments where he can't imagine himself being wrong. Again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 To be fair, I think you both are looking at the arguments wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Just now, theuntouchable said: It’s also a great way to hedge your bet by nonchalantly backing off from the certainty you initially held. my exact statement was that I’m more likely to bet on Swag. if I had to bet on Swag being right on all 5 or pickle being right on 1, I would bet on Swag first. Especially given that I know for a fact pickle was wrong on at least 1 of them (which coincidentally was his “strongest read”) Okay. Fair. I still want to check this at the end. A little experiment if you will. @SwAg => can you give your top 5 please. @Pickle Rick => can you give your top 6 please. UNT => Name the terms. Something besides a sig bet. Lets go with we get to decide the other persons persona/character next game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: It’s also a great way to hedge your bet by nonchalantly backing off from the certainty you initially held. my exact statement was that I’m more likely to bet on Swag. if I had to bet on Swag being right on all 5 or pickle being right on 1, I would bet on Swag first. Especially given that I know for a fact pickle was wrong on at least 1 of them (which coincidentally was his “strongest read”) I removed you a while ago so you wanna rethink that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Just now, Pickle Rick said: I removed you a while ago so you wanna rethink that. “Was” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 2 hours ago, SwAg said: So, if I go pull some quotes of you defending teammates indirectly, similar to now from previous scum games, you’ll do what exactly? I offer to go get quotes of you indirectly defending teammates. 2 hours ago, Ragnarok said: Laugh at the amount of time you wasted just to be wrong about me. You say you would laugh because it’s a waste of time and I would be wrong. 10 minutes ago, SwAg said: I literally offered to get it and you said you would laugh because it’s a waste of time and wrong, and then you disputed the definition of “right.” I repeat that I offered to go get quotes showing this after you disputed their existence, and repeat that you previously said it would be a waste of time and that I would be wrong. The “definition of right” remark is in relation to the follow-up in which you simply declared I would be wrong. 8 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: No, you asked what I would do if you came back with evidence of my defending teammates in thread. And I said I would laugh at the time you spent searching just to be wrong on me yet again. You are repeating the same message that I just said. 7 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: Just so you can't misrepresent what I said. You bump the quotes showing that you’re essentially agreeing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Just now, Matts4313 said: Okay. Fair. I still want to check this at the end. A little experiment if you will. @SwAg => can you give your top 5 please. @Pickle Rick => can you give your top 6 please. UNT => Name the terms. Something besides a sig bet. Lets go with we get to decide the other persons persona/character next game. Now see, this is where it gets interesting. kinda comes off like you want to make this bet BECAUSE you have knowledge of the scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 2 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: I don't even think Swag is scum right now. He has just has moments where he can't imagine himself being wrong. Again. You are not helping me rile him up. Shame shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Hello all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Just now, Matts4313 said: You are not helping me rile him up. Shame shame. Not trying to rile him up. Just not letting him twist things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 9 minutes ago, SwAg said: You just agreed with me and proved my point. I cannot tell if you’re seriously this inept at reading, or if you’re doing some bit where you make endless artificial distinctions for the sake of an appearance of arguing. 6 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: Whatever you need to tell yourself. You cannot rebut my point, so you exit. Seriously, wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 I looked through a couple pages and I find it unlikely Muhammad Hassan would be town in any event. He was more of an enemy to the crowd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 1 minute ago, Ragnarok said: Not trying to rile him up. Just not letting him twist things. Again, I think you both are looking at this whole interaction oddly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 So, now Ragnarok’s narrative has shifted that I am the disingenuous and deceitful illegitimate bastard son of Hitler, incapable of being trusted because Ragnarok made some random conclusions he’s incapable of backing up with anything more than more conclusory statements. But hey, it’s definitely not an indirect defense of Rick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: Now see, this is where it gets interesting. kinda comes off like you want to make this bet BECAUSE you have knowledge of the scum. smh - unt - remind me to teach you how to play this game afterwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts