Jump to content

Browns General Discussion


candyman93

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, candyman93 said:

Players as a whole love the people we put in charge of strength training. Strength training received an A+ grade. Our training staff got an A grade.

I was happy to see this, but pretty much every team loves their strength coaches, per the article. I'm glad we have some good guys in place for sure, but I'm not so sure we're groundbreaking on anything. Not that you need to reinvent the wheel when it comes to strength training.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, candyman93 said:

So I read the NFLPA grades for Cleveland. 

 

Players as a whole love the people we put in charge of strength training. Strength training received an A+ grade. Our training staff got an A grade.

 

Our flaw that I keep reading is that our spaces are crammed. The weight room is crammed and the lockers are crammed.

 

Lack of space is something Jimmy can easily fix. Finding fantastic trainers is a LOT harder to do.

I was surprised tbh.  For all of Jimmy’s faults he’s never been cheap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said:

I was surprised tbh.  For all of Jimmy’s faults he’s never been cheap. 

I read a Browns Wire article yesterday that he said the stadium was rushed and cheaply made/outdated and unfortunately he's not wrong. He wants a roof and better facilities/expansion. I'm all for it as long as the billionaire foots the bill and not the taxpayers. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MWil23 said:

I read a Browns Wire article yesterday that he said the stadium was rushed and cheaply made/outdated and unfortunately he's not wrong. He wants a roof and better facilities/expansion. I'm all for it as long as the billionaire foots the bill and not the taxpayers. 

They wont

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MWil23 said:

I read a Browns Wire article yesterday that he said the stadium was rushed and cheaply made/outdated and unfortunately he's not wrong. He wants a roof and better facilities/expansion. I'm all for it as long as the billionaire foots the bill and not the taxpayers. 

I’m fine with passing some of the cost onto the taxpayers of the city actually has a usable dome to do what they want with.  That could be a huge boost to the city.  But for a stadium that’s essentially just for the Browns and a couple other random games throughout the year?  **** that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said:

I’m fine with passing some of the cost onto the taxpayers of the city actually has a usable dome to do what they want with.  That could be a huge boost to the city.  But for a stadium that’s essentially just for the Browns and a couple other random games throughout the year?  **** that.

SOME of the cost can be buffered with sin taxes from alcohol, tobacco/vape products, and casino revenue. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, NateDawg said:

Tax the federal government. They have been making money each year, throughout the year until tax day, off of our interest free loans we give them. Time to pay the piper.

“Tax the Government” sounds like my 2024 Presidential campaign slogan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LETSGOBROWNIES said:

I’m in favor of puritan taxes personally.  Tax  churches.  
 

The sinners have paid our fair share for years.

Most churches run on the smell of an oily rag and taxing them would end them. Like a little methodist church with a leaky roof with 20 parishioners who are old lady's giving $20  week doesn't need taxation. A lot of churches are that. 

 

I know you guys have weird rules for churches and taxes, but aside from a few churches and maybe thr land holdings of the catholic churches they are not culprit. 

 

If businesses were taxed on profit correctly then no one would ha e to pay tax. Correct taxation of the wealthiest individuals and people is the real awnser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Kiwibrown said:

Most churches run on the smell of an oily rag and taxing them would end them. Like a little methodist church with a leaky roof with 20 parishioners who are old lady's giving $20  week doesn't need taxation. A lot of churches are that. 

 

I know you guys have weird rules for churches and taxes, but aside from a few churches and maybe thr land holdings of the catholic churches they are not culprit. 

 

If businesses were taxed on profit correctly then no one would ha e to pay tax. Correct taxation of the wealthiest individuals and people is the real awnser.

Lol churches must be different here my guy.  We’ve got pastors with private jets preaching in arenas that hold like 15k people.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...