TheKillerNacho Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 24 minutes ago, paul-mac said: 32 independent teams deciding not to sign him isn't collusion. I hope someone signs him, and I genuinely admire his movement, but I'm not sure he has a case here. This, entirely. This was not some kind of league-wide collusion to not sign him to a team. In fact, I'm pretty sure each team wanted one of the other 31 to sign him to make this story go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 33 minutes ago, FourThreeMafia said: He is a mediocre QB who has used his platform to push a false narrative and has proven to be more of a distraction than anything else. Based on talent, yes, he should have a job. This isnt about talent. This is about the distraction he presents and owners not wanting to deal with it. Has has no real case unless there is some damning evidence of it. Him simply not being signed is not evidence of collusion against him. The pros of signing him simply dont outweigh the cons for most teams. yeah... na... Are you secretly mike Pence? I don't think you can make that assertion here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawgX Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 7 minutes ago, Kiwibrown said: yeah... na... Are you secretly mike Pence? I don't think you can make that assertion here. Actually, it is false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Just now, DawgX said: Actually, it is false. It is true times infinity. no returns and I win. yay me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oregon Ducks Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Just now, DawgX said: Actually, it is false. It isn't. But, bye thread. Freaking snowflake alt righters can't discuss anything without insulting people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DawgX Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Just now, Oregon Ducks said: It isn't. But, bye thread. Freaking snowflake alt righters can't discuss anything without insulting people. LOL. I guess you don't like provable facts. And I'm an "alt righter" because I said it's a false narrative? You're the only one trying to insult people here, bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 1 minute ago, Oregon Ducks said: It isn't. But, bye thread. Freaking snowflake alt righters can't discuss anything without insulting people. id give you two likes but i cant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Just now, DawgX said: LOL. I guess you don't like provable facts. And I'm an "alt righter" because I said it's a false narrative? You're the only one trying to insult people here, bud. I aid I won before. adidn't you see that? oh and the facts. remember them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLadd Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 He's not gonna be able to prove it. This is a non-story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, DingoLadd said: He's not gonna be able to prove it. This is a non-story. yeah, what a non-story. I bet no news outlets take this up haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLadd Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 1 minute ago, incognito_man said: yeah, what a non-story. I bet no news outlets take this up haha News stories are gonna run with this for the next year or so because RATINGS and it gives media outlets more ammo to say whatever they want , doesn't mean it's actually worthy of being discussed though. I totally believe the NFL would collude against him because Goodell has proven he's totally willing to do stupid stuff for "the brand" in the past. But he's never going to prove it so it's not worth discussing IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Just now, DingoLadd said: News stories are gonna run with this for the next year or so because RATINGS and it gives media outlets more ammo to say whatever they want , doesn't mean it's actually worthy of being discussed though. I totally believe the NFL would collude against him because Goodell has proven he's totally willing to do stupid stuff for "the brand" in the past. But he's never going to prove it so it's not worth discussing IMO. why does it have to be provable to be a story? i don't see how one could simultaneously think it is plausible and be a non-story. It's absolutely a story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSUeagles14 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 i wonder if his gfs tweet is gonna come up. pretty sure if imply my possible future employer is a slave owner or whatever she did, im not getting that job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Small Town Values Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 1 hour ago, ohiogenius said: Collusion is a hard thing to prove I doubt he'll be able to. Unless he's got somebody on the inside willing to leak details for him. If the 30+ years of silence in the Weinstein saga proves anything, it's that if people are willing to bury things, they'll stay buried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Stick to talking football guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.