FloydFan Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 I obviously love Hooker, but you take him in the second round. In no way do you take him in the first. Even I will be irate if they do that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 12 minutes ago, FloydFan said: I obviously love Hooker, but you take him in the second round. In no way do you take him in the first. Even I will be irate if they do that. If you view him as a potential franchise level QB you probably have to trade back up into the late first to land him so you can get that 5th year option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydFan Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, NYRaider said: If you view him as a potential franchise level QB you probably have to trade back up into the late first to land him so you can get that 5th year option. True and that I can get behind, but not in the top 10. That’s crazy talk. Edited March 31, 2023 by FloydFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOaktown_56 Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 After a horrible predraft process Boutte might go 5th round. I'd definitely take a flier there. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 19 minutes ago, MrOaktown_56 said: After a horrible predraft process Boutte might go 5th round. I'd definitely take a flier there. I'm intrigued by Matt Landers late in the draft. 6'5" 200, 4.37s forty, 37" vert, 130" broad, 4.34s shuttle, 6.72s 3-cone Started at UGA but hardly played, transferred to Toledo and played pretty well (20/514/2), and then finally ended up at Arkansas where he had his best year (47/901/8). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 Drew Sanders pro day numbers 6'3" 236 4.59s forty (82nd percentile) 118" broad (57th percentile) 37" vertical (82nd percentile) 4.38s 20-yard shuttle (29th percentile) 7.15s 3-cone drill (45th percentile) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimkelly02 Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 3 hours ago, NYRaider said: I love Zach Kuntz, don’t think he makes it that far though. Same, that’s my guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimkelly02 Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 1 hour ago, MrOaktown_56 said: After a horrible predraft process Boutte might go 5th round. I'd definitely take a flier there. That might be the wildest story ever…. He was in a bunch of players and a coach who ran a train on recruiting coordinator. Talk about a dysfunctional system down there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrOaktown_56 Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 1 hour ago, NYRaider said: I'm intrigued by Matt Landers late in the draft. 6'5" 200, 4.37s forty, 37" vert, 130" broad, 4.34s shuttle, 6.72s 3-cone Started at UGA but hardly played, transferred to Toledo and played pretty well (20/514/2), and then finally ended up at Arkansas where he had his best year (47/901/8). Those numbers are nuts 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCOUGHMAN Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 6 hours ago, big_palooka said: Not really.... NFL offenses use spread concepts sure. But Huepel's offense works because of the wider hashes in college. It creates a ton of space, then you rely on defensive players to make a mistake. Works until a top defense like Georgia comes along and doesn't make mistakes in coverage. If you watch Hooker, he reads one side of the field. Often times, players on the other side of the field don't even move. QB just has to read one side and throw. Meh situational plays depending on defenses being played. Using decoys is a nfl thing also they even talked about it with that short fast wr we just got in fa. Again he still has to make the throws and work the pocket. I understand the hash mark factor but at the end of the day for qbs it’s still can you complete a pass consistently and lead a group of men. behind stroud and Bryce he’s my #3 qb this year followed by ar 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCOUGHMAN Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 1 hour ago, NYRaider said: Drew Sanders pro day numbers 6'3" 236 4.59s forty (82nd percentile) 118" broad (57th percentile) 37" vertical (82nd percentile) 4.38s 20-yard shuttle (29th percentile) 7.15s 3-cone drill (45th percentile) that 4.6 pro day speed explains everything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr A W Niloc Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 As much as I like Will Levis, taking him in round #1 gives up on Christian Gonzalez. That ain't gonna happen. If Hendon Hooker is available at #39 I'd take him. He is as smart as Young-Stroud and better than average in arm strength, accuracy, and evasiveness. (My mocks say this will cost me an upgrade at DE. I can live with that.) I can live with Jimmy G. The defense needs serious attention. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
massraider Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 10 minutes ago, NCOUGHMAN said: Meh situational plays depending on defenses being played. Using decoys is a nfl thing also they even talked about it with that short fast wr we just got in fa. Again he still has to make the throws and work the pocket. I understand the hash mark factor but at the end of the day for qbs it’s still can you complete a pass consistently and lead a group of men. That's fine if you believe that, for every QB. But many people think reading defenses is important, and they are NOT dragging Hooker for it. Why not? It's inconsistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 13 minutes ago, NCOUGHMAN said: that 4.6 pro day speed explains everything His forty time is fine but his 3-cone and shuttle numbers are pretty meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydFan Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 16 minutes ago, massraider said: That's fine if you believe that, for every QB. But many people think reading defenses is important, and they are NOT dragging Hooker for it. Why not? It's inconsistent. Because even if Hooker’s offense is simple he was still able to do his job as a passer in it at an elite level. Richardson was not. The traits that make Hooker a strong QB are different than Richardson and Levis and that’s fine, but some people have preferences that go one way or another in this situation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts