Jump to content

Rodgers to the Jets Trade Discussion


pgwingman

2023 Rodgers  

100 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team gives Rodgers the best shot in 2023?

    • Packers
      21
    • Somewhere else
      80


Recommended Posts

Just now, CWood21 said:

Possibly.  Even without taking into account OBJ, they're going to have a glut of WRs.  Garrett Wilson and Allen Lazard are obviously WR1 and WR2.  Corey Davis might be a cap casualty after that deal.  Elijah Moore would likely be redundant with Randall Cobb assuming they sign him.  OBJ makes it even more crowded.

Man, trading Moore to make room for Cobb and OBJ feels like a fool's errand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pgwingman said:

Man, trading Moore to make room for Cobb and OBJ feels like a fool's errand. 

I don't disagree, but I also don't think he's the WR going to get traded.  For me, Corey Davis is redundant with Allen Lazard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, pgwingman said:

Man, trading Moore to make room for Cobb and OBJ feels like a fool's errand. 

What makes Moore worth us taking him on? He played 16 games last year - so thats good - but his stats dont knock anybody over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pgwingman said:
5 minutes ago, CWood21 said:

Possibly.  Even without taking into account OBJ, they're going to have a glut of WRs.  Garrett Wilson and Allen Lazard are obviously WR1 and WR2.  Corey Davis might be a cap casualty after that deal.  Elijah Moore would likely be redundant with Randall Cobb assuming they sign him.  OBJ makes it even more crowded.

Man, trading Moore to make room for Cobb and OBJ feels like a fool's errand

Lazard is their #1, Moore/OBJ is their #2/#3

Meanwhile, Watson and Wilson are our new 1/2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Leader said:

What makes Moore worth us taking him on? He played 16 games last year - so thats good - but his stats dont knock anybody over.

Sure, but dropping a 2nd year player for guys who might have a year left in them is just silly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, incognito_man said:

Because one of the insiders just said GB is getting Wilson as part of the deal.

I’d be very pleased with that outcome. Would shut up the WR crowd and be a good compromise on the ones wanting to use 13 or 15 on a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, incognito_man said:

Because one of the insiders just said GB is getting Wilson as part of the deal.

God I hate that I have to ask this......

Would you give up this years first or second pick, from the Jets, for Wilson?

In other words...Rodgers for Wilson and a third next year that could become a second.

Or throw in a third or fourth (fourth is my preference) this year with Wilson and a pick next year for Rodgers.

And again, I kindda hate you right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...