PackFan13 Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 15 minutes ago, LLcheesehead12 said: Yeah, or at least when you got a guy like Toney who actually looks worse than both Amari Rodgers and ESB combined Well, this is just dumb. If nothing else he's an electric return man. Rodgers isn't even in the league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackFan13 Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 16 minutes ago, HighCalebR said: Wonder why tf Rodgers took all those guys who can't get open with him? Maybe he likes built in excuses? ALL THOSE guys is two people that know the offense one of which making near the minimum. haha. Lazard is fine as a number two next to an elite WR when he's your number one, you've got a bad WR room. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LLcheesehead12 Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 6 minutes ago, HighCalebR said: Think you're wrong big homie. Bad argument is bad. They were in 80-90% and ruined the offense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, PackFan13 said: ALL THOSE guys is two people that know the offense one of which making near the minimum. haha. Lazard is fine as a number two next to an elite WR when he's your number one, you've got a bad WR room. Once Garrett Wilson gets hurt (like Watson last year) he'll be the #1... like he was here. Uhh ohhhhh. 2 guys is 2/3rds of the starters lol. Wut Literally just described the Packers room last year. Edited September 8, 2023 by HighCalebR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 (edited) 1 minute ago, LLcheesehead12 said: They were in 80-90% and ruined the offense Nope. They weren't. You might be drunk. Check again. Edited September 8, 2023 by HighCalebR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackFan13 Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 1 minute ago, HighCalebR said: Once Garrett Wilson gets hurt (like Watson last year) he'll be the #1... like he was here. Uhh ohhhhh. 2 guys is 2/3rds of the starters lol. Wut Literally just described the Packers room last year. Wilson is on another tier than Watson. Look at his numbers with Zach Wilson. It's hilarious to me how butt hurt you all get and try and gang up on people who disagree with you. Do you think a top 5 defense makes up for a lack of offense if Wilson goes down? Sure does. Do they have better TE's than we had last year? They sure do. So sorry if that hurts to read. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, PackFan13 said: Wilson is on another tier than Watson. Look at his numbers with Zach Wilson. It's hilarious to me how butt hurt you all get and try and gang up on people who disagree with you. Do you think a top 5 defense makes up for a lack of offense if Wilson goes down? Sure does. Do they have better TE's than we had last year? They sure do. So sorry if that hurts to read. Is he? Or was he just healthy. Who's butt hurt? I have no problem or beef with Rodgers. But the constant excuse making for the guy deserves rebuttal. And I'm the one arguing against 2 people right now? Are you high? No they don't have better TEs. You're enamored with Tyler ******* Conklin. Man you're delusional. Edited September 8, 2023 by HighCalebR 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 5 minutes ago, HighCalebR said: Nope. They weren't. You might be drunk. Check again. Since he probably won’t back up his terrible argument with #s: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2022-snap-counts.htm Amari Rodgers played 8.96 percent last season. Maybe if he hadn’t been traded he could have hit 14-16 percent. Deguara played 23.58, Watkins 25.5, Cobb 33.91, Watson 46.34, Doubs 48.35, Lazard 78.88. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 2 minutes ago, HighCalebR said: Is he? Or was he just healthy. Who's butt hurt? And I'm the one arguing against 2 people right now? Are you high? No they don't have better TEs. You're enamored with Tyler ******* Conklin. Man you're delusional. This clown and his ilk like to cry “help help I’m being repressed!” the moment anyone tries to debunk their nonsense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighCalebR Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 Just now, Striker said: This clown and his ilk like to cry “help help I’m being repressed!” the moment anyone tries to debunk their nonsense. I don't really know why I'm wasting my time. I know this argument has been had with the same dudes a million times. I'm just excited to be sitting here with my wine watching ball. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 3 minutes ago, Striker said: Since he probably won’t back up his terrible argument with #s: https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2022-snap-counts.htm Amari Rodgers played 8.96 percent last season. Maybe if he hadn’t been traded he could have hit 14-16 percent. Deguara played 23.58, Watkins 25.5, Cobb 33.91, Watson 46.34, Doubs 48.35, Lazard 78.88. Because I hate myself, I looked at ESB in ‘20 and ‘21. He played 18.86 and 26.16 in those years. Of all Rodgers options the past three years, only Lazard, MVS, and Adams came close to 80 percent snap count. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackFan13 Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 4 minutes ago, HighCalebR said: Is he? Or was he just healthy. Who's butt hurt? I have no problem or beef with Rodgers. But the constant excuse making for the guy deserves rebuttal. And I'm the one arguing against 2 people right now? Are you high? No they don't have better TEs. You're enamored with Tyler ******* Conklin. Man you're delusional. 1100 yards as a rookie with possibly the worst QB in the league? Yes, he is. I'm a huge Watson fan but let's be realistic. Watson could still have a better career but as it stands he's the better player. Constant excuse-making is saying QBs struggle more with less talent around them.. got it. They absolutely have better TE's than we did last year. Lewis the 6th lineman, Tonyan post ACL that ran in slow motion and Deguara who has been nothing but a disappointment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackFan13 Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 4 minutes ago, Striker said: This clown and his ilk like to cry “help help I’m being repressed!” the moment anyone tries to debunk their nonsense. Who said anything about being repressed? You're an absolute clown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Striker Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 The Jet Sweep and Kadarius Toney have been net negatives for KC tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LLcheesehead12 Posted September 8, 2023 Share Posted September 8, 2023 Someone didn't take notes that the Lazard play doesn't work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.