bcb1213 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I'm going to vote no on issue 3. I don't think the system we have is broken in any way, so I see no need to change it. I don't think there's many undrafted free agents irl who sign three year deals 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, RedGold said: You can remove mine. My main reasoning was to reduce the amount of sheet work I was doing for ERFA I think you can all but ignore doing this in the sheets besides marking them signed erfa after they are renewed. It's something we can track and do in the transactions thread to save the added hassle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 I vow to do all my ERFA at the same time in one post to make it easier if that helps? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: I vow to do all my ERFA at the same time in one post to make it easier if that helps? I think he's referring to the tab we normally have that lists all the players eligible to be ERFA and RFA. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 Is there a certain number of majority votes needed to pass or is that not the case since we have co owners or is it just whether yes or no have the most votes at deadline? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedGold Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 No I don't plan on actually making that work. There's like 102 ERFA's. All of those have to be touched in sheet manually, as most are kept for the low cost. We can delete the proposal, my main reasoning was since most are kept.. it would be less work to do the Sub500 cut list, than the Tag list. It would only reduce it by the 32 PFA's, but it'd be less work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) I just want to be on the record that a 1st+ plus tender is a terrible idea. Realistically, the extra salary isn't going to dissuade anyone from tendering that player. What is the point of adding a 3rd round pick to the compensation? If it's a franchise QB, the offering team is still going to have to make a huge financial commitment to have any chance of clawing the player away from the team that tendered him. If you really, absolutely, desperately want to be able to acquire a QB who is getting tendered, then make a proposal that RFAs are tradeable until the end of the RFA bidding period. Alternatively, make it serious draft capital--a 1st and a 2nd, at minimum, preferably two 1sts. Edited January 4 by Blue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, Blue said: I just want to be on the record that a 1st+ plus tender is a terrible idea. Realistically, the extra salary isn't going to dissuade anyone from tendering that player. What is the point of adding a 3rd round pick to the compensation? If it's a franchise QB, the offering team is still going to have to make a huge financial commitment to have any chance of clawing the player away from the team that tendered him. If you really, absolutely, desperately want to be able to acquire a QB who is getting tendered, then make a proposal that RFAs are tradeable until the end of the RFA bidding period. It’s not terrible. The end Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: It’s not terrible. The end well that's just, like, your opinion, man also it will change absolutely nothing 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 17 minutes ago, Blue said: Alternatively, make it serious draft capital--a 1st and a 2nd, at minimum, preferably two 1sts. I am down for this if the price of placing this tag is equally costly to the tagger meaning a pretty hefty tag amount Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 28 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: Is there a certain number of majority votes needed to pass or is that not the case since we have co owners or is it just whether yes or no have the most votes at deadline? It's 9 to pass. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 55 minutes ago, Scoundrel said: Can someone run the summit that is more organized and patient than I am? Please. I tried but my mind only works or doesn’t work a certain way You did fine. I considered this more like a House Sub-Committee where we are crafting fine details of proposals before putting them forth for a full vote next week. Most of the time things don't make it out of committee. It's why I've been offering opinions and thoughts on the topics. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 4 Author Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, SirA1 said: You did fine. I considered this more like a House Sub-Committee where we are crafting fine details of proposals before putting them forth for a full vote next week. Most of the time things don't make it out of committee. It's why I've been offering opinions and thoughts on the topics. Thanks. I let Ted take over think he can manage it better than I can at the moment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InjuredReserve Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Where I stand on Proposal Votes #1 - Yes #3 - Yes #4 - Yes #6 - Yes Holding off on the others for now (either paused or I am unsure) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InjuredReserve Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 For now: #7 - No Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.