vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 @Packerraymond I'm looking at your table. First, you are sorting by pass block, not offense. And Walker isn't showing up. Tom is #24. Walker isn't even on that page. You confusing Walker with Slater??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 Just now, vegas492 said: @Packerraymond I'm looking at your table. First, you are sorting by pass block, not offense. And Walker isn't showing up. Tom is #24. Walker isn't even on that page. You confusing Walker with Slater??? It's not sorted by anything other than ranking, the link must not pull up what I'm looking at, I just copied and pasted the order as I see it the page before. Can't blame Zach Kruse when I can pull up the exact same list he's going off of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 1 hour ago, Kampfgeist said: If he can just double his games played this year it will have been worth it. Ooooh. He said he will have to think about doing that. Why do twice the work for the same pay? I know I wouldn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 I found Walker on your list, but it was sorted by pass block. #19. I feel like Rashawn Slater is being confused with Rasheed Walker. I'm legit running the same sort as you are, even down to the 50% of 703 minimum blocksnaps. He's #19 with passblock. Offense he's #24. 3 sacks, 3 hits, 13 hurries, 19 pressures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 https://premium.pff.com/nfl/positions/2023/CUSTOM/offense-blocking?position=T&week=9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18&minimum=50p Here is the search via @Packerraymond sort method. Helps to do 50% minimum snaps. Only this is sorted by Offense. #24 is Walker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 Just now, vegas492 said: https://premium.pff.com/nfl/positions/2023/CUSTOM/offense-blocking?position=T&week=9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18&minimum=50p Here is the search via @Packerraymond sort method. Helps to do 50% minimum snaps. Only this is sorted by Offense. #24 is Walker. I click that link and Walker is #19 lol. So I guess you can throw PFF grades for specific weeks out the window as entirely arbitrary depending on what number they decide to assign them when you click on them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 4 minutes ago, vegas492 said: I found Walker on your list, but it was sorted by pass block. #19. I feel like Rashawn Slater is being confused with Rasheed Walker. I'm legit running the same sort as you are, even down to the 50% of 703 minimum blocksnaps. He's #19 with passblock. Offense he's #24. 3 sacks, 3 hits, 13 hurries, 19 pressures. Copy and pasted right off the screen I'm looking at. #4. No Rashawn Slater on the list to confuse him with. 1 Penei Sewell 2 Tyron Smith 3 Trent Williams 4 Rasheed Walker 5 Taylor Moton 6 Andrew Thomas 7 Charles Cross 8 Mike Onwenu 9 Tristan Wirfs 10 Bernhard Raimann 11 Alaric Jackson 12 Christian Darrisaw 13 Zach Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 14 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: No idea what you're seeing, I'm in the same thing, he's #4. https://premium.pff.com/nfl/positions/2023/CUSTOM/offense-blocking?position=T&week=9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18&minimum=50p Just now, Packerraymond said: I click that link and Walker is #19 lol. So I guess you can throw PFF grades for specific weeks out the window as entirely arbitrary depending on what number they decide to assign them when you click on them. Oh my God, this is waaayyyy too funny! I'm just grinning from ear to ear over here. Let's keep trying this and sooner or later we will get him into #6...or #4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: Copy and pasted right off the screen I'm looking at. #4. No Rashawn Slater on the list to confuse him with. 1 Penei Sewell 2 Tyron Smith 3 Trent Williams 4 Rasheed Walker 5 Taylor Moton 6 Andrew Thomas 7 Charles Cross 8 Mike Onwenu 9 Tristan Wirfs 10 Bernhard Raimann 11 Alaric Jackson 12 Christian Darrisaw 13 Zach Tom 1 Tyron Smith 2 Jake Matthews 3 Christian Darrisaw 4 Laremy Tunsil 4 Taylor Moton 6 Garett Bolles 7 Rashawn Slater 8 Andrew Thomas 9 Trent Williams 9 Bernhard Raimann 11 Alaric Jackson 11 Jordan Mailata 13 Tristan Wirfs 14 Taylor Decker 15 Terron Armstead 16 Lane Johnson 17 Morgan Moses 18 D.J. Humphries 19 Charles Leno Jr. 19 Rasheed Walker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 Again @vegas492 I don't really give a **** if he's #1 or #201, he's playing well enough. I'm just saying you can't get after a guy for posting a fake ranking when I can run weeks 9-18 with 50% snap count and get the same list he's referring to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 @Packerraymond TASTES GREAT!!! .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 1 minute ago, Packerraymond said: Again @vegas492 I don't really give a **** if he's #1 or #201, he's playing well enough. I'm just saying you can't get after a guy for posting a fake ranking when I can run weeks 9-18 with 50% snap count and get the same list he's referring to. Yet I run it, with the same data points you are using and don't get anywhere near that. You feel that is acceptable for a "reporter". I do not. Fair 'nuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 3 minutes ago, vegas492 said: Yet I run it, with the same data points you are using and don't get anywhere near that. You feel that is acceptable for a "reporter". I do not. Fair 'nuff. Sounds like it might be a PEBKAC error idk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 @Packerraymond What's your score you get for Walker when you run the data. No ranking just scores. Offense/RunBlock/PassBlock. I get 71.9/64.9/74.0. I'm curious is those change at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 1 minute ago, Kepler said: Sounds like it might be a PEBKAC error idk. That is why I want to know the scores he is seeing, not the ranks. Is the scores are different, then I'm going to get some money back from PFF. Because we are running the same search on their site. Also? If Walkers overall for that time period is 71.9, that should tell everyone that he is certainly not in the top 4-6-10 in the league with that score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.