Jump to content

2024 offseason, a lot of work to do.


Recommended Posts

All you've proven is those "misses" are exactly why Howie has been trading up for whatever targeted player they have on the board the past few years.

Let's be real. The draft is a crap shoot. Nothing guaranteed.  Especially after the top 10-15 players in the draft.

Rarely are there 32 1st rd grades. So acquiring that blue chip type talent (Smitty, Davis, Carter) is always ideal. 

I'd be shocked if we stayed at #22 and don't trade up. For who, I don't know but its coming.  🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nabbs4u said:

All you've proven is those "misses" are exactly why Howie has been trading up for whatever targeted player they have on the board the past few years.

Which proves Howie can not evaluate the talent after 10.

JJ was a no brainer, everyone could see it except for Howie.

I am a huge WSU fan, but I cringed when we took Dillard.

Traded up ahead of Baltimore for Jordan Davis, who will never produce at a level to match his draft slot and the additional picks used to acquire him.  Could have stayed put and taken a pro bowl safety, a position that is a glaring weakness for the Eagles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, downundermike said:

JJ was a no brainer, everyone could see it except for Howie.

and 90% of this message board

52 minutes ago, downundermike said:

I am a huge WSU fan, but I cringed when we took Dillard.

In typical Eagles fashion the 4 players drafted directly after Dillard all have been productive.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, downundermike said:

Which proves Howie can not evaluate the talent after 10.

JJ was a no brainer, everyone could see it except for Howie.

I am a huge WSU fan, but I cringed when we took Dillard.

Traded up ahead of Baltimore for Jordan Davis, who will never produce at a level to match his draft slot and the additional picks used to acquire him.  Could have stayed put and taken a pro bowl safety, a position that is a glaring weakness for the Eagles.

Stoutland wanted Dillard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Scalamania said:

and 90% of this message board

In typical Eagles fashion the 4 players drafted directly after Dillard all have been productive.

Also to be fair, Doug had at least as much to do with the Reagor selection as Howie did.  Their scouting department wanted Jefferson, Doug and Howie overruled everyone else in the room and took Reagor.  Was Howie just getting Doug his guy, or was he of the same mindset as Doug? We'll probably never know the answer to that question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CasperX22 said:

Also to be fair, Doug had at least as much to do with the Reagor selection as Howie did.  Their scouting department wanted Jefferson, Doug and Howie overruled everyone else in the room and took Reagor.  Was Howie just getting Doug his guy, or was he of the same mindset as Doug? We'll probably never know the answer to that question.

I've always felt that Howie had a tendency to listen to his coaches a bit too much, and the longer Doug was here, the more Doug's MO took over... e.g. Press Taylor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Danger said:

I've always felt that Howie had a tendency to listen to his coaches a bit too much, and the longer Doug was here, the more Doug's MO took over... e.g. Press Taylor.

Also just in general in most years the league typically perceives there being 15 or less actual first round graded prospects

therefore the hit rate is only going to shrink.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, downundermike said:

Which proves Howie can not evaluate the talent after 10.

JJ was a no brainer, everyone could see it except for Howie.

I am a huge WSU fan, but I cringed when we took Dillard.

Traded up ahead of Baltimore for Jordan Davis, who will never produce at a level to match his draft slot and the additional picks used to acquire him.  Could have stayed put and taken a pro bowl safety, a position that is a glaring weakness for the Eagles.

Not really a reply to your overall point but safety is a glaring weakness? I was overall disappointed in the Davis pick and was clamoring for Hamilton. But I wouldn't call our safety room weak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Last Stand said:

Stoutland wanted Dillard. 

If you watched Dillard in college, he was a solid prospect.
He had good technique for a rookie, he was just too weak, especially in the lower half and got pushed around.
Then he saw his first opportunity at RT and got manhandled.

I don't know of anyone who at the time though he was a bad pick.
In fact, it was widely regarded as a coup to move up ahead of Texas for him.

It doesn't appear that he did all that was necessary to get functionally stronger.
Sometimes the right pick just doesn't work out.
Now, Reagor over Jefferson ..........😭

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Last Stand said:

Stoutland wanted Dillard. 

Story I remember was he hadn’t really done much on Dillard because they thought he’d go way earlier. Stout was brought in to double check late and said sure, but it wasn’t like the long process of work he did for Mailata, Jurgens, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...