TCMD Discussion!!

[RedGold]

31 minutes ago, winitall said:

I wouldn’t boo too hard, now you can use all of your round 1 bids on other players and still offer Bradham a giant deal the eagles don’t want to match without giving up picks. 

Some of us don’t have the luxury of offering above market value lol

[DTMW78]

1 minute ago, Forge said:

Yes, that trade was included. 

 

He better hope that someone really likes Kirk then.

[Forge]

Just now, DTMW78 said:

He better hope that someone really likes Kirk then.

Not that it matters...can't tag and trade in this. Never could. That's why the original WAS GM quit

[USC_Fan]

Was the tag not for only one 1st??

[BringinDaPain]

4 minutes ago, USC_Fan said:

Was the tag not for only one 1st??

@USC_Fan you may want to check with @ny92jefferis

[winitall]

12 minutes ago, Forge said:

Try 52 million 

Serious question, how much cap space is he going to have left for the first round of free agency?  He had $38 million before adding cousins on the tag and the other RFA players he tendered. That’s going to make it really hard to retain any of his players and take him out of the running for almost every stud in free agency. If he gets two firsts that is all fine and dandy but it’s still quite the risk. 

[winitall]

13 minutes ago, samsel23 said:

Some of us don’t have the luxury of offering above market value lol

If you need cap space that badly I’m sure I could take a few players off your hands 

[ny92mike]

26 minutes ago, BringinDaPain said:

@USC_Fan you may want to check with @ny92jefferis

This was the rules we used back in 2016

I'm fine with it being required 2 first round picks, or using the below.  

@Forge

 

The new ruling is as follows:

The old team will receive a minimum value of 1000 pts based on the draft pick value chart.  The deal must contain a minimum of one first round pick, however, should the value of that first round pick not equal 1000 pts the new team will continue to add draft picks from the current year and/or (if the old team agrees) future draft stock until the 1000 pts is reached.

1. You are not permitted to trade this player.

2. You are not permitted to alter or extend this player’s contract.

3. New Club contract structure rules are identical to that of the exclusive rights franchise tag.

[mountainpd]

Remember Tannehill is available now Kirk has been tagged. 

 

[Forge]

3 minutes ago, ny92jefferis said:

 

This was the rules we used back in 2016

I'm fine with it being required 2 first round picks, or using the below.  

@Forge

 

The new ruling is as follows:

The old team will receive a minimum value of 1000 pts based on the draft pick value chart.  The deal must contain a minimum of one first round pick, however, should the value of that first round pick not equal 1000 pts the new team will continue to add draft picks from the current year and/or (if the old team agrees) future draft stock until the 1000 pts is reached.

1. You are not permitted to trade this player.

2. You are not permitted to alter or extend this player’s contract.

3. New Club contract structure rules are identical to that of the exclusive rights franchise tag.

I'm fine with this. 

Kirk Cousins is the bane of our existence at this point lol

[ny92mike]

4 minutes ago, ny92jefferis said:

 

This was the rules we used back in 2016

I'm fine with it being required 2 first round picks, or using the below.  

@Forge

 

The new ruling is as follows:

The old team will receive a minimum value of 1000 pts based on the draft pick value chart.  The deal must contain a minimum of one first round pick, however, should the value of that first round pick not equal 1000 pts the new team will continue to add draft picks from the current year and/or (if the old team agrees) future draft stock until the 1000 pts is reached.

1. You are not permitted to trade this player.

2. You are not permitted to alter or extend this player’s contract.

3. New Club contract structure rules are identical to that of the exclusive rights franchise tag.

To clarify, rule 2 should be removed since we do allow extensions for tagged players, but its for the greater of the expected APY or tagged amount in this case the tagged amount.

[ny92mike]

ATTENTION

I found a formula error in the tagged extension sheet in your team roster workbooks which will need to be addressed, so please don't rely on those numbers.

 

Also, I'm locking you guys out of the RFA workbook so that I can get that set up.  You'll still have access to your fa trans workbooks which provides you a list of your teams rfa listing.

[LuckyNumber11]

me seeing Cousins and Norvell tagged 

[Forge]

Just now, LuckyNumber11 said:

me seeing Cousins and Norvell tagged 

I had that same feeling about Norwell and Lawrence lol. 

[Fragafootball]

Just my two cents:

I think its a pretty silly rule if people can't extend Franchise tagged players. I understand not being able to trade tagged players. But I do believe it is allowed in the NFL.