D82 Posted September 28, 2018 Author Share Posted September 28, 2018 I'd rank our needs right now as: 1. WR 2. FS 3. TE QB, DE could both be needs as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBoys Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 1. QB 2. TE 3. S 4. WR 5. DE 6. DT 7. C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 Offensively, aside from TE, I am really happy with our talent level. Which tells me everything I need to know about the coaching / scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resilient part 2 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: Offensively, aside from TE, I am really happy with our talent level. Which tells me everything I need to know about the coaching / scheme. You think not having a "true" number 1 receiver is OK? or at least a true burner that can scare defenses deep? Someone has to make teams pay for creeping up the LOS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBoys Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, resilient part 2 said: You think not having a "true" number 1 receiver is OK? or at least a true burner that can scare defenses deep? Someone has to make teams pay for creeping up the LOS. Tavon Austin is a true burner, you saw that in week 2. Beasley is a top tier slot guy. Brady would get him over 1,000 year in year out. Then a slew of decent #2 guys Hurns, TWill, Gallup. We don't have a true number 1 but Dak doesn't need one remember? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 12 minutes ago, resilient part 2 said: You think not having a "true" number 1 receiver is OK? or at least a true burner that can scare defenses deep? Someone has to make teams pay for creeping up the LOS. Yes. You don't need a dominant WR1 to win games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaBoys Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 This is what I think the team feels their needs are: 1. TE 2. S 3. DE* depending on DLaw 4. TE 5. #2 WR 6. TE 7. C 8. LB 9. CB 10. DE 11. TE 12. OG 13. Replacement for Tyron 14. Replacement for Zeke 15. #1 WR 16. New coaching staff 17. New stadium 18. Replacement for Dak 19. Replacement for SJ 20. Team relocation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resilient part 2 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 6 minutes ago, DaBoys said: This is what I think the team feels their needs are: 1. TE 2. S 3. DE* depending on DLaw 4. TE 5. #2 WR 6. TE 7. C 8. LB 9. CB 10. DE 11. TE 12. OG 13. Replacement for Tyron 14. Replacement for Zeke 15. #1 WR 16. New coaching staff 17. New stadium 18. Replacement for Dak 19. Replacement for SJ 20. Team relocation you comedy in DA-mornings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
resilient part 2 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 9 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: Yes. You don't need a dominant WR1 to win games. to win games? no, but I want more than just to win games. Most, not all teams winning big have at least 1 true WR (NE exception) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 7 minutes ago, resilient part 2 said: to win games? no, but I want more than just to win games. Most, not all teams winning big have at least 1 true WR (NE exception) Eagles. - 18 Patriots. -17 Ravens. -13 Giants. -12 Steelers - 09 Giants -08 Maybe I am crazy - but I don't recall an elite WR on any of those teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPJ Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 59 minutes ago, resilient part 2 said: You think not having a "true" number 1 receiver is OK? or at least a true burner that can scare defenses deep? Someone has to make teams pay for creeping up the LOS. I dont think a true number 1 receiver is needed, however I agree we need someone with some seriously deep speed. Coaching aside, look at what Brandon Cooks has done for the Rams offense. I believe Kupp and Woods are really good solid number 2 options, but having Cooks out there really opens things up for them as they seem to have mismatches against teams #2 and #3 CBs. We get the right coach, along with someone who can flat out run, would do wonders for people like Gallup and Beasley. The question that would still remain, can Dak get them the ball? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 21 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: Eagles. - 18 - Nick Foles (lol) Patriots. -17 - who cares about WR, have Brady Ravens. -13 - Anquan Boldin(?) Giants. -12 - Victor Cruz Steelers - 09 - Hines Ward Giants -08 - Steve Smith Maybe I am crazy - but I don't recall an elite WR on any of those teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas_OutLaw7 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 4 minutes ago, WizardHawk said: I assume this is affirmation of my point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WizardHawk Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, Texas_OutLaw7 said: I assume this is affirmation of my point? I think at those points in career those guys would have been considered elite. Cruz put 1500 yds. Boldin, Smith, and Ward could make case for HoF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt79511 Posted September 28, 2018 Share Posted September 28, 2018 Hakeem Nicks before his body fell apart was infinitely better than any of our receivers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.