Jump to content

Khalil Mack traded to the Bears (Page 19)


RaidersAreOne

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, MrOaktown_56 said:

Can we at least wait until the season is over to see what the picks will be??

That still won't be long enough for the comparison.  Two years of picks, 6? years of cap(somehow this always gets overlooked), and then maybe we can try to compare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MrOaktown_56 said:

Can we at least wait until the season is over to see what the picks will be??

It won't be close to fair. Unless bears completely get worse in the offseason and some how we get way better. Giving them our 2nd didmt make sense than and it looking worse every week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, true2form said:

That still won't be long enough for the comparison.  Two years of picks, 6? years of cap(somehow this always gets overlooked), and then maybe we can try to compare. 

Cap space shouldnt matter in the compensation we got for Mack. Why are people reaching to try to defend dumb stuff we do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, dante9876 said:

Cap space shouldnt matter in the compensation we got for Mack. Why are people reaching to try to defend dumb stuff we do. 

Agree. Cap space is so overblown. If you want certain players, you can fit them. See the Rams. 

All the cap space Gruden wasted this offseason, he could have paid Mack, started younger guys and the team would have been better for it. 

Then the dumber argument.... well with Mack, we're picking 10 anyway. But without him we're picking 1 overall which we all hope to draft Bosa to rush the passer lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dante9876 said:

It won't be close to fair. Unless bears completely get worse in the offseason and some how we get way better. Giving them our 2nd didmt make sense than and it looking worse every week. 

The bears still have the Rams, Packers, and Vikings twice on their schedule. It's not some cakewalk to the playoffs. I agree with giving up our 2nd, that was dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, big_palooka said:

Agree. Cap space is so overblown. If you want certain players, you can fit them. See the Rams. 

All the cap space Gruden wasted this offseason, he could have paid Mack, started younger guys and the team would have been better for it. 

Then the dumber argument.... well with Mack, we're picking 10 anyway. But without him we're picking 1 overall which we all hope to draft Bosa to rush the passer lol 

*cough cough* trade down with the #1 pick *cough cough* lol

ill almost sig bet bosa doesn’t go #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...