Jump to content

Is Jason Garrett the new Rasputin of coaches?


CKS97

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, ///mcompact said:

Bill Callahan brought that to Dallas, not Linehan.  Linehan's offense in Detroit was as pass-happy as Garrett's (before Bill Callahan showed up in Dallas).  Garrett has adopted it into "his" offense.

Reread the sentence homie. 

Edit - here I will help:

1. We now run Scott Linehans west coast offense

2. with a zone run game concept.

 

I never attributed point 2 to SL. And neither of the concepts apply to Jason. If you think our 2007 and 2018 offenses look anything alike, I dont really know what to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ///mcompact said:

I reread it. So you're saying that Dallas is running a west-coast offense?  

We are absolutely running a WCO. With Garrett calling plays, all out WRs ran 10+ yard routes. With SL calling plays, none of our WRs run 10 yard routes.

 

Or have you not gone mad with the 5 wide, all running 8 yard curls yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2018 at 2:11 PM, Danger said:

No. Marvin Lewis has them beat. John Fox made the Super Bowl with multiple teams. Had opportunities based on success. Jeff Fisher also made the Super Bowl but was very much in the same boat Jason Garrett is now.
 

Marvin Lewis is the king.

Do not compare Jeff Fisher to The Clapper. 

 

Fisher: 4 10+ win seasons in 5 years from 1999-2003 compared to Garrett's 2 in 7 full seasons.

And you can't tell me that Fisher stunted McNair's development as a QB compared with Dak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CKS97 said:

Do not compare Jeff Fisher to The Clapper. 

 

Fisher: 4 10+ win seasons in 5 years from 1999-2003 compared to Garrett's 2 in 7 full seasons.

And you can't tell me that Fisher stunted McNair's development as a QB compared with Dak.

Fisher coached for 22 seasons though.... you're misconstruing the data.

Jason Garrett didn't stunt his QB's growth. Dak and the terrible GM did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Danger said:
3 hours ago, CKS97 said:

Do not compare Jeff Fisher to The Clapper. 

 

Fisher: 4 10+ win seasons in 5 years from 1999-2003 compared to Garrett's 2 in 7 full seasons.

And you can't tell me that Fisher stunted McNair's development as a QB compared with Dak.

Fisher coached for 22 seasons though.... you're misconstruing the data.

To be fair, I could see The Clapper end  up with the same amount of 10 win seasons 15 years from now. So it might still apply?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Matts4313 said:

Garretts offense was a timing based, air croyell passing game with a power run game.

We now run Scott Linehans west coast offense with a zone run game concept. 

Our offense literally could not be more opposite than what it was when JG was calling the plays. 

LOL, no.

Back when Garrett actually called the plays, he was running Todd Haley/Tony Sparano's offense. Sparano guided him in putting together the playbook in 2007. 

And then he was relieved of his OC duties (because he's a horrid play caller) and hasn't done a thing other than hold the "head coach" title ever since. He does phony rah rah speeches that none of the players give a **** about (this is an Ivy League educated guy pretending he's a "footbowl coach, sonnnn"). The Cowboys even tried to bring in Dan Reeves as a consultant in 2009 in part to oversee Garrett's ****ty game plans, only for that to fall through.

The WCO is long extinct. Show me a team running nearly every play out of the pro set, split backfield, barely even using a #3 receiver, and then you can tell me that's a WCO. 

The last time we saw anything remotely resembling a WCO was Holmgren during the Hasselbeck years in Seattle. 

And Jerry Jones has been excellent with talent evaluation. He overrode Parcells wanting Spears at #11 in the 2005 draft to take DeMarcus Ware there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
13 minutes ago, CKS97 said:

Thread bump

2 more Rasputin games wins

It's like he never loses the game he cannot afford to lose

Last week for sure, but I think he could have afforded to lose this game. Winning, along with the Skins losing Alex Smith, means they make the playoffs or at least come close, which I think would ensure another year for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...