WindyCity Posted October 19, 2018 Author Share Posted October 19, 2018 4 hours ago, JustAnotherFan said: This is poor journalism and yet another case of people believing everything they read without fact checking it first. --Trubisky is 12-26, not 28 attempts....the 46% is correct. --The Browns have 32 attempts, not 37. Taylor is 4-13 and Mayfield is 7-19 which puts them at 34%, not 32%. --Keenum is 14-35 (40%), not 32 attempts 40%. --etc,etc When will people realize that media outlets will do anything to garner clicks.....even if it means spreading false info. /end rant. Where are these numbers from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, WindyCity said: Where are these numbers from? https://nextgenstats.nfl.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 Trubisky Week 1: https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/season/mitchell-trubisky/TRU215336/2018/1/pass Week 2: https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/season/mitchell-trubisky/TRU215336/2018/2/pass Week 3: https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/season/mitchell-trubisky/TRU215336/2018/3/pass Week 4: https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/season/mitchell-trubisky/TRU215336/2018/4/pass Week 6: https://nextgenstats.nfl.com/charts/player/season/mitchell-trubisky/TRU215336/2018/6/pass Go ahead and count 'em yourself. There is alot more data on this subject as well but NGS (the NFL) have become are D-bags. FYI, NGS (a proprietary technology owned by the NFL) use modern chips placed in players pads and the ball to get accurate ball placement and distance. They also use this same technology to get other inside info as well that they used to openly release to publishers and writers who use analytics as a basis. But this year they decided to throw in a little clause in the agreement contract that basically says you can't mix data taken from their technology with other forms of data in order to paint a clearer picture and add more context. Sorry for the second rant..........carry on.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAR FACE DOWN ARROW Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 You bring a neat perspective with all this data analysis, thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 WOULD SOMEONE MAKE A GD GAME THREAD ALREADY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G08 Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 16 hours ago, Sugashane said: There is no way a media outlet could be completely unreliable while still garnering the attention of millions? There is no way they could get paid so much while being idiots, right? I had to scroll down to see the pictures you posted, but my money would have said you put: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WindyCity Posted October 19, 2018 Author Share Posted October 19, 2018 Bears are also bottom 5 in passes within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superman(DH23) Posted October 20, 2018 Share Posted October 20, 2018 10 hours ago, G08 said: I had to scroll down to see the pictures you posted, but my money would have said you put: CNN would be a much better fit to the description. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G08 Posted October 20, 2018 Share Posted October 20, 2018 12 hours ago, Superman(DH23) said: CNN would be a much better fit to the description. That would be false, my friend. If you look at the number of mostly false (or worse) claim made by each network, Fox news operates at 59% while CNN is at 27%. Nobody will be 100% accurate in today's day and age, but Fox News literally is right-wing propaganda and that sect of America's politics does not give a single **** about honest, fact-based journalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAR FACE DOWN ARROW Posted October 20, 2018 Share Posted October 20, 2018 Oooooh good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugashane Posted October 20, 2018 Share Posted October 20, 2018 1 hour ago, G08 said: That would be false, my friend. If you look at the number of mostly false (or worse) claim made by each network, Fox news operates at 59% while CNN is at 27%. Nobody will be 100% accurate in today's day and age, but Fox News literally is right-wing propaganda and that sect of America's politics does not give a single **** about honest, fact-based journalism. Both are straight trash and not worth anyone's time. Measuring them isn't about which is good, it has to be done by which is the least ****ty. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G08 Posted October 20, 2018 Share Posted October 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, Sugashane said: Both are straight trash and not worth anyone's time. Measuring them isn't about which is good, it has to be done by which is the least ****ty. Lol It all went to hell when Reagan's administration abolished the Fairness Doctrine (policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was—in the FCC's view—honest, equitable, and balanced). To really be informed as American these days you need to read a lot, research, and come to your own conclusions. Never going to happen so this is the road we find ourselves on today... sad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugashane Posted October 20, 2018 Share Posted October 20, 2018 Wait so it only blocks out **** out of ****ty? Does it do that for all words? ****tah ****tims Mi**** Edit- Hahaha. It does! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugashane Posted October 20, 2018 Share Posted October 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, G08 said: It all went to hell when Reagan's administration abolished the Fairness Doctrine (policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was—in the FCC's view—honest, equitable, and balanced). To really be informed as American these days you need to read a lot, research, and come to your own conclusions. Never going to happen so this is the road we find ourselves on today... sad! Love this post. To compound that Americans are willing to believe nonsensical propaganda on Facebook at face value. The Muslim Prayer Curtain hoax is still circulating. People are willing to be ignorant and incompetent provides it fits their agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardown3231 Posted October 20, 2018 Share Posted October 20, 2018 Keep this very fun and unbiased conversation going, boys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.