big_palooka Posted April 23, 2021 Share Posted April 23, 2021 1 hour ago, RaidersAreOne said: They'll be paying (literally) for all these major splash moves + signing guys to top 5 contracts eventually, but damn... The 3-4 rings they will have will be worth it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted April 23, 2021 Share Posted April 23, 2021 1 minute ago, big_palooka said: The 3-4 rings they will have will be worth it Not if 49 year old Tom Brady has anything to say about it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted April 23, 2021 Share Posted April 23, 2021 Just now, RaidersAreOne said: Not if 49 year old Tom Brady has anything to say about it! KC made it clear they are not going to get bullied up front in a re-match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted April 23, 2021 Share Posted April 23, 2021 Working on my only mock of the year but I really think the Chiefs double down on OT at 58. They know that Tampa game was an absolute embarrassment in the trenches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 3 hours ago, big_palooka said: The 3-4 rings they will have will be worth it The same thing they said about the Rams and they're one of the Super Bowl favorites after acquiring Stafford. The salary cap is a myth, especially if you have a cash rich owner, because teams can always create more cap space by restructuring money into signing bonuses so it doesn't count towards the cap. Mark Davis being probably the brokest owner in the league hurts us a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 2 hours ago, BayRaider said: Working on my only mock of the year but I really think the Chiefs double down on OT at 58. They know that Tampa game was an absolute embarrassment in the trenches. They've also said they're open to bringing back Schwartz and/or Fisher. Adding Brown, Thuney, Blythe, and Long were all good moves to retool their OL. But I could definitely see them going OT at #58, Stone Forsythe would be a slight reach there but a good addition to their OL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 56 minutes ago, NYRaider said: They've also said they're open to bringing back Schwartz and/or Fisher. Adding Brown, Thuney, Blythe, and Long were all good moves to retool their OL. But I could definitely see them going OT at #58, Stone Forsythe would be a slight reach there but a good addition to their OL. You're going to hate my new mock. Remember, it's what I think THEY will do, not what I would do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted April 24, 2021 Share Posted April 24, 2021 30 minutes ago, BayRaider said: You're going to hate my new mock. Remember, it's what I think THEY will do, not what I would do. Is that who you have them taking there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Teddy B traded to the Broncos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 1 minute ago, agarcia34 said: Teddy B traded to the Broncos For a 6th round pick, which also likely means the Broncos won't go after a QB in the 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Everyone celebrates in the AFC West cause Teddy B doesn't scare anyone and dont have to worry about Fields or Lance 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 1 minute ago, agarcia34 said: Everyone celebrates in the AFC West cause Teddy B doesn't scare anyone and dont have to worry about Fields or Lance Assuming Carolina doesn't go QB, after the top 3, two of the top 5 QB's could slide down the board... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 This doesn’t mean Broncos wouldn’t select Fields or Lance if they fell to them at 9. It just means they definitely aren’t trading up for them. Teddy provides competition for Lock and also a brilliant smokescreen so that teams won’t trade up to #8 if Lance or Fields are on the board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYRaider Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 2 minutes ago, BayRaider said: This doesn’t mean Broncos wouldn’t select Fields or Lance if they fell to them at 9. It just means they definitely aren’t trading up for them. Teddy provides competition for Lock and also a brilliant smokescreen so that teams won’t trade up to #8 if Lance or Fields are on the board. Yeah, I could still see Denver going QB at #9, but I could also see them passing on QB at #9 now as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BayRaider Posted April 28, 2021 Share Posted April 28, 2021 Just now, NYRaider said: Yeah, I could still see Denver going QB at #9, but I could also see them passing on QB at #9 now as well. I don’t see it. If Lance or Fields are there, they are the pick. Even Adam reported it after I submitted that post like 2 minutes ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts