Chili Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 I'm not saying anything.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Chili said: I'm not saying anything.... think he copped the same backplate lacy used back in the day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HyponGrey Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 6 hours ago, Chili said: I'm not saying anything.... We like our OLB hefty it seems. The inside/outside threat is real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boratt Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 OLB heavy, yeah. Our 5ts are fairly fast and fit as well so it’s kind of a versatile group. Mont ran 4.86 at 306 coming out. He’s in better shape now so it’s probably more 4.8. Lowry is a 4.87 guy too. The value in the speed from our 5ts is because if we were to move one of the OLBs onside to take advantage of a match up, the 5t will be covering more space on the outside and it will help if they can run. So there is size versatility from our OLBs and speed/conditioning versatility at 5t. Those qualities together open us up to move the LBs inside without getting gashed in the flats and on the edges. It makes a lot more sense why they got rid of Daniels. They want to do some more creative things up front and they need guys who can run. im starting to see their vision come together. Can’t wait. I see some things coming that we haven’t seen before and I see it as being highly effective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer_ESP Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 1 hour ago, boratt said: It makes a lot more sense why they got rid of Daniels. They want to do some more creative things up front and they need guys who can run. No offense but if our system wants our DL to run I better start finding another sport to follow this fall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boratt Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Packer_ESP said: No offense but if our system wants our DL to run I better start finding another sport to follow this fall. If you’re gonna bring an edge defender inside as a Suprise move, the DL player who’s now responsible for covering that edge space better be able to run a little bit. Don’t know how that doesn’t make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 25 minutes ago, boratt said: If you’re gonna bring an edge defender inside as a Suprise move, the DL player who’s now responsible for covering that edge space better be able to run a little bit. Don’t know how that doesn’t make sense. Lol that has nothing to do with it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PACKRULE Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 21 minutes ago, Norm said: Lol that has nothing to do with it What does it have to do with then? Just asking so I can have it explained. To often people on the board get told their wrong with no point of correction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 9 minutes ago, PACKRULE said: What does it have to do with then? Just asking so I can have it explained. To often people on the board get told their wrong with no point of correction. Wait, you both think we cut Mike Daniels because we might do more zone blitzes or stunts or some **** that would force him to have to "run" more in open space so instead we're going to have dean ******* lowry and montravius adams do it because they are so clearly superior at "running?" I'm sorry. That's the dumbest **** I've read about the whole thing. Even if it's somehow even sort of true, it had absolutely nothing to do with the decision. There's no way Gute sat there and was like nah, I gotta cut Daniels, Montravius Adams and Dean Lowry run one tenth of a second faster in 40 yards and that's gonna be super duper required for this defense. inb4cwoodyellsatmeforswearing, I'm not actually mad, I just think this is a super ridiculous point if we're pretending it was an important factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PACKRULE Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 32 minutes ago, Norm said: Wait, you both think we cut Mike Daniels because we might do more zone blitzes or stunts or some **** that would force him to have to "run" more in open space so instead we're going to have dean ******* lowry and montravius adams do it because they are so clearly superior at "running?" I'm sorry. That's the dumbest **** I've read about the whole thing. Even if it's somehow even sort of true, it had absolutely nothing to do with the decision. There's no way Gute sat there and was like nah, I gotta cut Daniels, Montravius Adams and Dean Lowry run one tenth of a second faster in 40 yards and that's gonna be super duper required for this defense. inb4cwoodyellsatmeforswearing, I'm not actually mad, I just think this is a super ridiculous point if we're pretending it was an important factor. Beloved Norm you miss the point. I think nothing I do not know the answer. You clearly know that the other poster is wrong but offer nothing other than drunken protest. My question was legit so I will restate It now. Norm you swollen bar stool ornament what is the answer if Borrat is so wrong. If you do not have a suitable answer only mere ***** then go sleep it off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 9 minutes ago, PACKRULE said: Beloved Norm you miss the point. I think nothing I do not know the answer. You clearly know that the other poster is wrong but offer nothing other than drunken protest. My question was legit so I will restate It now. Norm you swollen bar stool ornament what is the answer if Borrat is so wrong. If you do not have a suitable answer only mere ***** then go sleep it off. I'm only hungover. I just gave a suitable answer. We didn't cut Mike Daniels because his ability to move backwards or to the edges of the field is so inferior to Adams or Lowry. There's no way it was such a difference that it pushed us into this. Kinda waiting for Borrat then to show me what that difference is. He just said a thing, there was nothing behind it. I came off like a **** but I just absolutely thing it's silly to think that was a major factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 I mean it should be abundantly clear why they moved on from Daniels- they wanted to spend that money on a younger, cheaper, healthier player. 90% of NFL personnel moves are based on the same premise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 16 minutes ago, PACKRULE said: Beloved Norm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 Preston Smith looks soft in the middle. Could stand to lose a bit around his waste area IMO. Man, I hope he's not the next Joe Johnson signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted August 3, 2019 Share Posted August 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Norm said: Wait, you both think we cut Mike Daniels because we might do more zone blitzes or stunts or some **** that would force him to have to "run" more in open space so instead we're going to have dean ******* lowry and montravius adams do it because they are so clearly superior at "running?" I'm sorry. That's the dumbest **** I've read about the whole thing. Even if it's somehow even sort of true, it had absolutely nothing to do with the decision. There's no way Gute sat there and was like nah, I gotta cut Daniels, Montravius Adams and Dean Lowry run one tenth of a second faster in 40 yards and that's gonna be super duper required for this defense. inb4cwoodyellsatmeforswearing, I'm not actually mad, I just think this is a super ridiculous point if we're pretending it was an important factor. Did I post this post? It says Norm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.