Scoundrel Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 I’m down for KSJ or TK3 tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted October 3, 2019 Author Share Posted October 3, 2019 VC Tk3 - 4 - Matts4313, The Orca, ET80, MWil23 kingseanjohn - 2 - squire12, Counselor Mwil23 - 1 - kingseanjohn rackcs - 1 - bcb1213 The Orca - 1 - rackcs squire12 - 1 - Tk3 ET80 - 1 - Nazgul Yet to vote: Dome, Forge, Llamalover, theuntouchable Can't vote: SwAg 75 minutes left to go! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Seriously. Go actually read. ET is claiming I’m trying to play the victim by citing an example of a game in which I accused people who only posted on flavor, and the reason why I persisted with that read was their reaction to my accusation. Apparently, game history is just off limits for ET. He is basically not playing because he knows he can do this, because you all perpetually allow it. It’s a convenient excuse. Dude comes in and says he’s ignoring three people, and chooses me right after I include three words in one post that he took offense to. Then, he tries to spin it, and go look what he did last time, in the example I cited: he tried to spin it. And I show it’s false, based on plain text, and he says I proved his point by disproving his premise. I’ve been using this as a game argument. I slipped in some borderline remarks to give him an out to actually play and call it out, look how hypocritical I am being, and he didn’t even mention it until he opted to disengage again. He is hiding right in front of you, actually obviously, and you all let it go because of the name attached to the post. It’s absolutely insane how people are content jumping away from that without acknowledgement because oh no feelings or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 I’ll drop it if anyone can put forth an actual argument as to why you are refusing to even entertain or acknowledge it, whenever the case has manifested before your very eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, SwAg said: Seriously. Go actually read. ET is claiming I’m trying to play the victim by citing an example of a game in which I accused people who only posted on flavor, and the reason why I persisted with that read was their reaction to my accusation. Apparently, game history is just off limits for ET. He is basically not playing because he knows he can do this, because you all perpetually allow it. It’s a convenient excuse. Dude comes in and says he’s ignoring three people, and chooses me right after I include three words in one post that he took offense to. Then, he tries to spin it, and go look what he did last time, in the example I cited: he tried to spin it. And I show it’s false, based on plain text, and he says I proved his point by disproving his premise. I’ve been using this as a game argument. I slipped in some borderline remarks to give him an out to actually play and call it out, look how hypocritical I am being, and he didn’t even mention it until he opted to disengage again. He is hiding right in front of you, actually obviously, and you all let it go because of the name attached to the post. It’s absolutely insane how people are content jumping away from that without acknowledgement because oh no feelings or something. Name attached? ET ain’t **** to me 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 But Swag let’s test it out. If he is town you die next ET Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, SwAg said: I’ll drop it if anyone can put forth an actual argument as to why you are refusing to even entertain or acknowledge it, whenever the case has manifested before your very eyes. Because I have been playing for nearly a decade with ET80 and I have never seen him fake-rage to not attempt to play. He has more class than that - he isnt like me and that low life scum @Dome. His gambits are different. Sure, maybe he is scum AND raging. But he is not attempting to "hide in front of us/not play" by purposely raging. Its just not his style IMO. Which discredits your entire case in my eyes. I still have both you and him scummy tho. Maybe yall are warring factions. Wouldnt that be funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 I’ll say give me mwil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKillerNacho Posted October 3, 2019 Author Share Posted October 3, 2019 VC Tk3 - 4 - Matts4313, The Orca, ET80, MWil23 Mwil23 - 2 - kingseanjohn, theuntouchable ET80 - 2 - Nazgul, Counselor kingseanjohn - 1 - squire12 rackcs - 1 - bcb1213 The Orca - 1 - rackcs bcb1213 - 1 - Tk3 Yet to vote: @Dome, @Forge, @Llamalover Can't vote: SwAg 60 minutes left to go! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 Between ET and Mwil I'll go ET I guess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tk3 Posted October 3, 2019 Share Posted October 3, 2019 unless we could run a train on bcb or someone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 Just now, Matts4313 said: Because I have been playing for nearly a decade with ET80 and I have never seen him fake-rage to not attempt to play. He has more class than that - he isnt like me and that low life scum @Dome. His gambits are different. Sure, maybe he is scum AND raging. But he is not attempting to "hide in front of us/not play" by purposely raging. Its just not his style IMO. Which discredits your entire case in my eyes. I still have both you and him scummy tho. Maybe yall are warring factions. Wouldnt that be funny. This was so bad that I cannot even consider this an actual argument. There are numerous instances of players saying X to permit them to do Y, which is what at the base of this case is. ET regularly engages in gimmicks that are conducive to not actually playing. You telling me that he has too much class to do something to abstain from participation is an absolute joke. If you want to say it’s a null, that is one thing, but your position is verifiably untrue. How about him saying nothing but Beef Supreme for basically two days? Is that not using a tactic to abstain from actually playing? Your whole perspective is warped and lacks credibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwAg Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 I’ll go bcb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 1 minute ago, Tk3 said: unless we could run a train on bcb or someone Stay on ET Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 4, 2019 Share Posted October 4, 2019 1 minute ago, Tk3 said: unless we could run a train on bcb or someone Kinky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.