The Orca Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 Rome is just in another class in this one. The skill players, the defense, the depth, it just isnt competitive as Rome takes this one in a laughter. Solid gameplan from the Wolves, but it just cant make up the difference here Rome 38-14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 Forcing Teddy to throw in this one seems to have backfired for Anchorage, he came to play big time. With his receiving core, there is not much Anchorage could do to keep pace. 28-14 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 Haters Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 I'm going Anchorage here. First of all Kupp should be eligible for this game if the trade didnt get approved til after the deadline, rightfully, he should NOT be considered for Camden and should be considered here. I think this is a shoot out but in the end, Kittle comes up big, catapulting Ingram for an 83 yard run that leads to a late score 35-31 Anchorage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 To add to that, in my game, Jlash doesn't even have Kupp listed as part of his team, you know why? Because he wasnt yet. This isnt rl, we arent tied to what a team probably wouldnt do irl, we are tied to the defined rules of the LG and subject to the rules, Kupp is active in this game for Anchorage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 I argue we should implement a “no trading on Sunday” rule to avoid this issue in the future. If you need a dude for your game, trade during the week. If not, wait until after the damn games. I get that interferes with the instant gratification of trading that is apparently a thing in the league but there’s no reason to be trading at 1pm on a Sunday. For the record Kupp is active this game in my opinion 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 8 minutes ago, Whicker said: I argue we should implement a “no trading on Sunday” rule to avoid this issue in the future. If you need a dude for your game, trade during the week. If not, wait until after the damn games. I get that interferes with the instant gratification of trading that is apparently a thing in the league but there’s no reason to be trading at 1pm on a Sunday. For the record Kupp is active this game in my opinion I agree with this 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 I admit I can’t read time properly and did not realize Counselor made his trade Saturday night. In my opinion he is NOT eligible for the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 10 minutes ago, Whicker said: I argue we should implement a “no trading on Sunday” rule to avoid this issue in the future. If you need a dude for your game, trade during the week. If not, wait until after the damn games. I get that interferes with the instant gratification of trading that is apparently a thing in the league but there’s no reason to be trading at 1pm on a Sunday. For the record Kupp is active this game in my opinion He was traded Saturday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 22 minutes ago, wwhickok said: To add to that, in my game, Jlash doesn't even have Kupp listed as part of his team, you know why? Because he wasnt yet. This isnt rl, we arent tied to what a team probably wouldnt do irl, we are tied to the defined rules of the LG and subject to the rules, Kupp is active in this game for Anchorage. I do know why. Because he said he didn't have time /want to change his writeup like he posted in thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 1 minute ago, bcb1213 said: He was traded Saturday If only I had just figured this out. There needs to be a rule implemented. There is no reason to make a trade at the time this trade was made other than gratification to the owner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 Just now, Whicker said: If only I had just figured this out. There needs to be a rule implemented. There is no reason to make a trade at the time this trade was made other than gratification to the owner Yea I just replied when I was going down. I reply as I get to em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 On 10/8/2019 at 11:06 AM, bcb1213 said: You don't trade a guy then have him play for your team. Plain and simple. You see this Irl at trade deadlines. Players literally get pulled from baseball games when trades are announced deadline day A couple things: 1. You don't legislate this. This isn't IRL. The Kupp trade wasn't agreed upon until Sunday morning and wasn't approved in enough time for anyone (you or WW in my case) to account for any changes. You can play it like Kupp isn't there, but you don't get to tell everyone else they have to do it too. 2. This isn't baseball. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 4 minutes ago, Jlash said: A couple things: 1. You don't legislate this. This isn't IRL. The Kupp trade wasn't agreed upon until Sunday morning and wasn't approved in enough time for anyone (you or WW in my case) to account for any changes. You can play it like Kupp isn't there, but you don't get to tell everyone else they have to do it too. 2. This isn't baseball. Ehh but I did account for it. Check my write up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted October 9, 2019 Share Posted October 9, 2019 That being said, I'm going with Rome in this one. I think his game plan was far more detailed, where Counselor did the thing I gave Rags and Xmad some pause for with "we're going to run power man inside and outside and heavy zone scheme. We're going to lean TE heavy in the pass game but also target the WR's a ton". It's a lack of not necessarily detail....but focus I guess in the game plan? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.