DingoLadd Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, wwhickok said: No. Technically Dak still belongs to me because until he is either an FA or 3 up and overed, he is under my control. The fact you'd rather have a horribly inconsistent QB that throws a ton of ints over a fairly consistent QB that doesnt turn it over often.. I mean, ok. Oh so for now alright then. I traded a 1st+3rd for Dak I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just saying I'd rather have Allen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 Just now, DingoLadd said: Oh so for now alright then. I traded a 1st+3rd for Dak I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just saying I'd rather have Allen. So you'd rather have Allen even though you guys have Mahomes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 25 minutes ago, DingoLadd said: Suspect #2 is off the list. That leaves Ruskie, PR, Ragnarok, Rack, Bcb, Lukic I doubt Ruskie doesn't 3up Ryan so eh. I wouldn't doubt PR would be aggressive in trying to upgrade his QB but Goff to Prescott isn't a major upgrade. Rags can 3up Brady but he seemed certain he wouldn't be bringing him back, almost like he had a deal lined up. Rack just 3downed Rivers how dare you. and only has Mayfield who has been inconsistent to say the least, I can't say much about him since we haven't done the mafia tango but he seems like a gambler. Bcb isn't very aggressive but I could see him trying to upgrade on the bears biggest bust since Rexy. Leaving Lukic who I doubt would trade a 1st for Prescott he also doesn't own a 2020/2021 1st. I'm gonna say PR/Rags traded for Dak. I would actually strongly consider trading for Dak if it wasn't a 3Over. Dont have a 3Up to spare. And I'm sure not paying the max value of Daks comtract. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLadd Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, wwhickok said: So you'd rather have Allen even though you guys have Mahomes? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: I would actually strongly consider trading for Dak if it wasn't a 3Over. Dont have a 3Up to spare. And I'm sure not paying the max value of Daks comtract. A 3up and over is Max value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 Just now, Counselor said: A 3up and over is Max value? Yup. 100% of a players contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLadd Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, MD4L said: Yup. 100% of a players contract. To quote the rules. 3 up & over (Start of Off-Season until beginning of BDL FA) : A 3up & over gives the chance to owners to trade away or for BDL UFA’s. If an owner trades for a BDL UFA, the have to resign them at 75% of his IRL contract. Each owner is limited to one 3up & over per year (either if you trade for or away the player) and a 3up & over will count against the 3up limit for both parties Multiple free agents can be dealt in 3 up and over deals (one from each team) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, MD4L said: Yup. 100% of a players contract. Yeah I’m pretty sure the rules say 75% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, Counselor said: A 3up and over is Max value? 1 minute ago, MD4L said: Yup. 100% of a players contract. So I distinctly remember us setting it up to be 100%. However, in the rules it says 75%. Unless we voted on that in an owner's meeting and I'm forgetting, the rulebook is incorrect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, DingoLadd said: To quote the rules. 3 up & over (Start of Off-Season until beginning of BDL FA) : A 3up & over gives the chance to owners to trade away or for BDL UFA’s. If an owner trades for a BDL UFA, the have to resign them at 75% of his IRL contract. Each owner is limited to one 3up & over per year (either if you trade for or away the player) and a 3up & over will count against the 3up limit for both parties Multiple free agents can be dealt in 3 up and over deals (one from each team) 1 minute ago, Counselor said: Yeah I’m pretty sure the rules say 75% Unless we changed it during an owner's meeting, the rulebook is incorrect here. We did it that way to improve free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 Lmao a loophole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 Just now, Ragnarok said: So I distinctly remember us setting it up to be 100%. However, in the rules it says 75%. Unless we voted on that in an owner's meeting and I'm forgetting, the rulebook is incorrect. I do not remember any 3 UP and over being less than 100% of a deal. Don’t recall this being argued on during any BDL meetings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DingoLadd Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 Just now, Ragnarok said: So I distinctly remember us setting it up to be 100%. However, in the rules it says 75%. Unless we voted on that in an owner's meeting and I'm forgetting, the rulebook is incorrect. I would second that given the second part of that says you can have multiple 3up & overs despite saying "You can only have one per season" unless it implied trading FAs between teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Ragnarok said: So I distinctly remember us setting it up to be 100%. However, in the rules it says 75%. Unless we voted on that in an owner's meeting and I'm forgetting, the rulebook is incorrect. Yea I think we changed it to 75 percent across their board when we went from 85 to 75 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoundrel Posted January 17, 2020 Share Posted January 17, 2020 Well better figure it out cus the contract Swole posted for Peters is 75% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts