Jump to content

Wrasslemafia 2- Day 10


bcb1213

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, Malfatron said:

No, I caught dome in the gambit xD

And i found swags incogruity in the posted pm xD

And i voted md4l xD

and i knew pickle was scum even though i never voted for him xD

and i faked an guilty investigation on counselor who turned up scum xD

and i once said that squire was scum who motivated swag xD

To be fair having to become a killer in that game hurt our chances. A mafia tracker is hard to pinpoint with no investigator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:

Not trying to rile him up.  Just not letting him twist things.

There has been nothing twisted.  You are incapable of showing how I allegedly twisted it, or deliberately opting not to do so.  I went post-by-post with commentary.  Your explanation point are barely coherent declarations and conclusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MD4L said:

I looked through a couple pages and I find it unlikely Muhammad Hassan would be town in any event. He was more of an enemy to the crowd.

If memory serves he was heel his entire run. They nixed his character for fear of heat from 9/11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JoshstraDaymus said:

If memory serves he was heel his entire run. They nixed his character for fear of heat from 9/11

Yeah massive heel. Unless everyone starts as town that’s a character we should look to eliminate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SwAg said:

I offer to go get quotes of you indirectly defending teammates.

You say you would laugh because it’s a waste of time and I would be wrong.

I repeat that I offered to go get quotes showing this after you disputed their existence, and repeat that you previously said it would be a waste of time and that I would be wrong.  The “definition of right” remark is in relation to the follow-up in which you simply declared I would be wrong.

You are repeating the same message that I just said.

You bump the quotes showing that you’re essentially agreeing.

 

6 minutes ago, SwAg said:

 

You cannot rebut my point, so you exit.

Seriously, wtf

@Blue can you give us the etymological analysis here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Matts4313 said:

smh - unt - remind me to teach you how to play this game afterwards.

Are you shaking your head at me? Or yourself? 
 

I find it extremely interesting that you even felt the need to butt into this. Let alone go as far as to want to make a bet on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SwAg said:

So, now Ragnarok’s narrative has shifted that I am the disingenuous and deceitful illegitimate bastard son of Hitler, incapable of being trusted because Ragnarok made some random conclusions he’s incapable of backing up with anything more than more conclusory statements.  But hey, it’s definitely not an indirect defense of Rick.

You know Swag is off the deep end when he invokes Godwin's law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, theuntouchable said:

To be fair, I think you both are looking at the arguments wrong. 

 

7 minutes ago, theuntouchable said:

Again, I think you both are looking at this whole interaction oddly. 

How so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, theuntouchable said:

Are you shaking your head at me? Or yourself? 
 

I find it extremely interesting that you even felt the need to butt into this. Let alone go as far as to want to make a bet on it. 

I find it extremely predictable that you cant figure out why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:

You know Swag is off the deep end when he invokes Godwin's law.

You’re latching onto hyperbole.  Address the substance of the argument if it’s so clear.  What exactly did I twist and how did you show it?  I quoted the specific sections with particularized questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...