LoganF89 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 I just peaked at the FFMD workbook and looked at our picks so far, you guys have done a great job! I would be extremely happy with this! 1)2. Chase Young 3)2. Damon Arnette 3)6. Chase Claypool Great job! what are we thinking for pick 4)2. I see some TEs that would be a good pick. Trautman would be amazing 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ovfd55 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, LoganF89 said: I just peaked at the FFMD workbook and looked at our picks so far, you guys have done a great job! I would be extremely happy with this! 1)2. Chase Young 3)2. Damon Arnette 3)6. Chase Claypool Great job! what are we thinking for pick 4)2. I see some TEs that would be a good pick. Trautman would be amazing TE or Oline most likely 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoganF89 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 38 minutes ago, ovfd55 said: TE or Oline most likely Im hoping TE, I saw a few people talking about a guard but honestly if there is still an OT that has some talent I would take the OT. reason being is that we have scherrf, Martin, and just signed the other Wes. Idk if guard would be a top priority for me right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTMONK HOF Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Awesome job! Love Claypool! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostnote Posted April 7, 2020 Author Share Posted April 7, 2020 I am hoping to get an OT out of the next couple of picks, at least, for development. There are a couple that I like and I have highlighted them on the Spreadsheet. This TE class is surprisingly deep, but there are just a few that I like. I know there are a few that some others like as well. But I dont want to limit our picks to those positions, if there is a better option as the BPA, then we have to take that into account. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtle28 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 22 minutes ago, mike23md said: I am hoping to get an OT out of the next couple of picks, at least, for development. There are a couple that I like and I have highlighted them on the Spreadsheet. This TE class is surprisingly deep, but there are just a few that I like. I know there are a few that some others like as well. But I dont want to limit our picks to those positions, if there is a better option as the BPA, then we have to take that into account. I’d like to go TE or OT but, we shouldn’t also pass up BPA. The only positions I wouldn’t take are RB and DL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtle28 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 (edited) Here’s my lost in order: 74, 83, 72, 75, 78, 80, 82, 83 I see you have #70 highlighted, my worry with him is blocking. We all looked the other way on JR’s blocking for 6 years bc of his dynamic talent. I really don’t want a guy in that position who can’t block at all, that kills our running game. We now have 4 WRs who are probably better blockers then #70, that’s not acceptable. Edited April 7, 2020 by turtle28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoganF89 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 7 minutes ago, turtle28 said: Here’s my lost in order: 74, 83, 72, 75, 78, 80, 82, 83 I see you have #70 highlighted, my worry with him is blocking. We all looked the other way on JR’s blocking for 6 years bc of his dynamic talent. I really don’t want a guy in that position who can’t block at all, that kills our running game. We now have 4 WRs who are probably better blockers then #70, that’s not acceptable. where can i find that spread sheet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtle28 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Just now, LoganF89 said: where can i find that spread sheet I’ll PM it to you, @mike23md made it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoganF89 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 Just now, turtle28 said: I’ll PM it to you, @mike23md made it thanks boss never used PMs on here before 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ovfd55 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 13 minutes ago, turtle28 said: Here’s my lost in order: 74, 83, 72, 75, 78, 80, 82, 83 I see you have #70 highlighted, my worry with him is blocking. We all looked the other way on JR’s blocking for 6 years bc of his dynamic talent. I really don’t want a guy in that position who can’t block at all, that kills our running game. We now have 4 WRs who are probably better blockers then #70, that’s not acceptable. I'd prob be 83 80 then 71 72 or 75 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoganF89 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, turtle28 said: I’ll PM it to you, @mike23md made it I can agree with that list. and with your assessment on 70. this one is a shocker and im gonna get some heat for it but 76 is interesting if hes there this late. I know this position is rumored to not be selected but..... you never know what you may get, or could light a fire under our projected starter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoganF89 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 110, 114, 122, 135, 138 or ones im interested in with our 2nd 4th if they are there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtle28 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 13 minutes ago, ovfd55 said: I'd prob be 83 80 then 71 72 or 75 I’m bullish on 74, I have been all year. His QB play affected his play imo, when he had better QB play he produced as a sophmore and that was in the SEC, not in the PAC 12 or in FCS level. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ovfd55 Posted April 7, 2020 Share Posted April 7, 2020 14 minutes ago, turtle28 said: I’m bullish on 74, I have been all year. His QB play affected his play imo, when he had better QB play he produced as a sophmore and that was in the SEC, not in the PAC 12 or in FCS level. I'm Bullish on 83 cause I love his ceiling,his floor isn't that high though I'd admit.Also seemed to fit right in at Senior bowl didn't look out of place. 74 Scares me cause on a lot of reports I read they talk about stiffness in short route,and He thinks he'll win with size speed which won't cut it in NFL.Also with all that production in SEC only 1 TD in his 3 years came vs a ranked team. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.