Ghostnote Posted April 6, 2020 Author Share Posted April 6, 2020 3 minutes ago, MikeT14 said: The issue is everyone wants to trade down (myself included lol) I think claypool if no one else takes him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ovfd55 Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 Honestly after Drafting Arnette,I'd see if anyone wants to trade for Fabian,most CBs are gone now and might get something back. I'd be ok with taking OC/OG,WR,or TE at the next pick Personally I like the idea of taking the WR if he's there then trading back up and getting one of the 3 TEs we can't decide who we like best Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostnote Posted April 6, 2020 Author Share Posted April 6, 2020 And actually I am fine with Bryant too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceinthehouse Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 8 minutes ago, mike23md said: I think claypool if no one else takes him. I'm good with that. 😁 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsin2013 Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 (edited) TE or OG. Don't need a WR. We NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED a TE. Edited April 6, 2020 by Skinsin2013 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e16bball Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 Don’t listen to @MikeT14, he’s a traitor. Taking Michael Pittman two picks before us, onto a roster that already has two starting WRs. That’s just selfish and RUDE! 😂 I prefer Albert O to Hunter Bryant, for what it’s worth. I actually prefer Harrison Bryant to Hunter Bryant, I think. But from a strategy standpoint, I think I’d prefer to take Claypool or even Duvernay here and then grab one of these highly equivalent TEs a round from now. I can’t imagine that every one of Trautman, Albert O, Bryant x2, and Hopkins will go this round. We could get one of the last of the tier 3 WRs now and then grab whichever TE is still on the board. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e16bball Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 Just now, Skinsin2013 said: TE or OG. Don't need a WR. I think we do. And I think we don’t need to draft for need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsin2013 Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 Just now, e16bball said: I think we do. And I think we don’t need to draft for need. What do we need worse? Way worse? Give Kelvin Harmon time/opportunity to develop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ovfd55 Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, e16bball said: Don’t listen to @MikeT14, he’s a traitor. Taking Michael Pittman two picks before us, onto a roster that already has two starting WRs. That’s just selfish and RUDE! 😂 I prefer Albert O to Hunter Bryant, for what it’s worth. I actually prefer Harrison Bryant to Hunter Bryant, I think. But from a strategy standpoint, I think I’d prefer to take Claypool or even Duvernay here and then grab one of these highly equivalent TEs a round from now. I can’t imagine that every one of Trautman, Albert O, Bryant x2, and Hopkins will go this round. We could get one of the last of the tier 3 WRs now and then grab whichever TE is still on the board. Yeah I woulda pushed for Pittman if @MikeT14 didn't draft him,also nice pick at 67 with Uche havn't studied him alot cause don't think we draft a Pass Rusher not named CHase Yong but saw on twitter today that he's a possible shocker for a 1st round pick to get him in 3rd is value 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 5 minutes ago, e16bball said: Don’t listen to @MikeT14, he’s a traitor. Taking Michael Pittman two picks before us, onto a roster that already has two starting WRs. That’s just selfish and RUDE! 😂 I prefer Albert O to Hunter Bryant, for what it’s worth. I actually prefer Harrison Bryant to Hunter Bryant, I think. But from a strategy standpoint, I think I’d prefer to take Claypool or even Duvernay here and then grab one of these highly equivalent TEs a round from now. I can’t imagine that every one of Trautman, Albert O, Bryant x2, and Hopkins will go this round. We could get one of the last of the tier 3 WRs now and then grab whichever TE is still on the board. And I only took Pittman because my 3 targets went way before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceinthehouse Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 Honestly, I think 1 of the 3 TE's were targeting? Might be there with our high 4th. And let's not forget guys? Chase Claypool is one of those WR's who could transition to TE. That's a worst case scenario on that. I have no problem going Claypool at 70, then target a true TE with our high 4th. If there gone, we move on to different position or best available player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeT14 Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 A 6'4" target for Dwayne does sound nice 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ovfd55 Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 Just now, aceinthehouse said: Honestly, I think 1 of the 3 TE's were targeting? Might be there with our high 4th. And let's not forget guys? Chase Claypool is one of those WR's who could transition to TE. That's a worst case scenario on that. I have no problem going Claypool at 70, then target a true TE with our high 4th. If there gone, we move on to different position or best available player. I like Claypool cause he could fit outside,in the slot,or block from tight and bunch sets 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtle28 Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 (edited) The solution is easy, draft Claypool and play him at TE. He’s a good blocker - but could improve there - and he’d be a match up nightmare on seam routes vs LBs & safeties. He’ll be like a young version of Vernon Davis. At 6’4, 238, he doesn’t need to put on 20 pounds - at the least - to play TE unlike Harmon and Cam Sims who are 20-25 pounds underweight to be an in-line blocker. Edited April 6, 2020 by turtle28 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aceinthehouse Posted April 6, 2020 Share Posted April 6, 2020 (edited) I can't believe Ben Bredeson OL Michigan rank -70 "6'5""" 320 Is still available. Wow! He's a 2nd Rd prospect. Edited April 6, 2020 by aceinthehouse 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.