MookieMonstah Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Just now, CWood21 said: But what made them think that touch was a civ special? Well Touch has been very clear that he has the ability to follow people haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Just now, MookieMonster said: Well Touch has been very clear that he has the ability to follow people haha I must have missed that. But unless the role has changed, the only thing that watching people does is tell you who visited. Not who they are or what faction they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 2 hours ago, theuntouchable said: So whicker is on this lynch VC but is in the middle. @domepatrol91 the hammer role you mentioned earlier? Did it matter when that person placed their vote? Like if they're in the middle it either doesn't work or they have the option to use it but if they're the final vote it counts as two? https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Hammerer According to the wiki the hammerer role is usually passive and has no indication of what happened other than a person was lynched at L-1. I highly doubt we have a hammerer in this game. 2 hours ago, theuntouchable said: I wanna talk more about mookie too. N1 we know that tk3 either visited or attempted to hit him but he was saved by "a group of people". Then he was silenced and still has been. Now silence is usually a mafia move but what if it was a civ move? Every other protection/revival has had that person get hurt and survive yet the attempt on mookie never harmed him. He was saved by a group before anything could happen. He was blocked from voting but his vote still counted. Is it possible someone used an ability to take control of his vote? If so I think Hockey might have been the one since the vote block was lifted and hockey died. 10 minutes ago, CWood21 said: And ET don't tell anyone who you've protected. I think he already said he protected Dome. What does this mean about untouchable? It looks like he was targeted by mafia and so he had to protected by someone or something else. 3 minutes ago, CWood21 said: I must have missed that. But unless the role has changed, the only thing that watching people does is tell you who visited. Not who they are or what faction they are. How can you have missed that? The entire day 3 was untouchable arguing for a ksj lynch because he visited Tk3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 @Whicker what makes you think hockey had anything to do with mookie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 4 minutes ago, theuntouchable said: @Whicker what makes you think hockey had anything to do with mookie? Nothing. It was just speculation. Hockey died and the mookie vote block was lifted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theuntouchable Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 minute ago, Whicker said: Nothing. It was just speculation. Hockey died and the mookie vote block was lifted. It was the other way around and I think it's obvious hockey used a move on pats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whicker Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 minute ago, theuntouchable said: It was the other way around and I think it's obvious hockey used a move on pats What do you mean other way around? The vote block going away and hockey dying happened at the same time? And yeah you're right hockey used a move on Pats. It's possible the vote block could have been a one-shot and he had other one-shot moves or I could be completely wrong. I am just trying to speculate why mookie's would have counted yesterday when bcb said he couldn't vote and now it seems like his restrictions has been lifted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Wait...I thought Pats said his move could only potentially kill mafia players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted October 19, 2017 Author Share Posted October 19, 2017 Vote Count Whicker--2--touch, elite texan 6 to lynch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 19 hours ago, Pats#1 said: We later talked about how it makes sense that if a civ tried something with me they would simply get their powers taken away as punishment, but if a Mafia did the same they'd die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Yep. Exactly what I thought, so looks like Mr. Pats#1 hasnt been honest with us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 19 hours ago, Pats#1 said: 20 hours ago, Hockey5djh said: What is this? I can hurt you via turning you into a vanilla townie, losing your powers, if you try to do anything with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MookieMonstah Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Basically Hockey sacrificed himself to prove that Pats is lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 17 hours ago, Pats#1 said: 18 hours ago, MookieMonster said: No worries. Its tough to navigate as people are demanding you explain but stuff like that is vital to keep to yourself. Tough situation. Yea I know it's really valuable to be able kill Mafia if they try to kill you, I really did want to keep it hidden, but didn't want to seem so sketchy that a civ would investigate me and i would in turn take away their powers and hurt our long term goal. Mafia can still kill me, but it's hard/tricky to, so I figured it was worth the risk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dome Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Before we get too crazy on Pats.... I wasn't able to investigate utley last night. Anyone have any insight to why? @james.mcmurry13 didn't like him, I know. But he didn't like whicker either. I'm also wondering about CWood who hasn't been all that active. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.