Jump to content

Who would you have taken at #17?


Recommended Posts

Now that the first round smoke has been cleared and the controversial pick has been made, I want to know who everyone would’ve actually picked #17 given the circumstances.  I thought it would be fun to look at during the next off-season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, BayRaider said:

With the current players that were available:

1) Darrisaw

2) Farley

Not sure going beyond that matters. 

I respect it. That’s who I pretty much had. I just found it interesting that Darrisaw slid so far

Edited by Jeremy408
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Jeremy408 said:

I respect it. That’s who I pretty much had. I just found it interesting that Darrisaw slid so far

There were very quite rumors that some GMs say him as more of a 2nd round prospect.... I thought Darrisaw would fall to us based on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, jimkelly02 said:

There were very quite rumors that some GMs say him as more of a 2nd round prospect.... I thought Darrisaw would fall to us based on that.

Never heard anything like that

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, jpaulthe1st said:

1. Darrisaw

2. Paye

3. JOK 

Would have been happy with any of those 3

I wouldn’t’ve drafted paye.  It was interesting seeing that JOK didn’t even go in the first round

Edited by Jeremy408
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jeremy408 said:

Is interesting that Jenkins didn’t go in the 1st

Well he was a Mid/Late 2nd Rounder before Kollmans video. Kollman has so much influence and subscribers, that he can move guys up media boards just by posting a video. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

David not at #17 but felt OT has more value in 2nd to guys falling. JOk in 2nd would be steal then Cisco I'm 3rd and CB in 3rd. I'll be ok with FS and subbat in 3rd

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BayRaider said:

Well he was a Mid/Late 2nd Rounder before Kollmans video. Kollman has so much influence and subscribers, that he can move guys up media boards just by posting a video. 

I don’t think that’s accurate re: jenkins.  

and Kollman has less than 300k subs lmao. He’s not a market mover

Edited by Turnobili
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...