Jump to content

BDL Discussion Thread 2022


Jlash

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Blue said:

FYI Cancun should be No. 1 in the Mid/West region, on the strength of our tie. Workbook seems to be confused on how to handle ties.

You are first if I'm not mistaken, it just is listed wrong but numbered right, although other numbers are out of order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ragnarok said:

Who had Aidan Hutchinson picking off Aaron Rodgers today?

On an absolutely incredible play.

Looking like you, Wwhickok, and Rack all made great moves in ditching your previous starting QBs last offseason.

Sure, you didn't pick up a suitable replacement, but that's what the draft is for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ny92mike said:

I'll take a look to see if I can figure out the issue.

 

probably because it's not sorted by adjusted wins. Although the rest of the standings don't do tiebreakers well. Those are complicated though but it would be nice if they sorted by division wins then point differential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LAOJoe said:

probably because it's not sorted by adjusted wins. Although the rest of the standings don't do tiebreakers well. Those are complicated though but it would be nice if they sorted by division wins then point differential.

We have always had to wait until after the season is over and go through the different tie breakers for Playoff seeding.

It's just something that has to be done Manually. Much like the future draft picks. The $$ for future years is not accurate because we won't know the final standing and order until after the season is over. 

I think Mike tried to do that last year as well. The two future draft pick lists are just for record keeping of who owns which picks so that they can be entered correctly when we set the draft order in January. It doesn't automatically update the order based off in season records. SO that money value listed there is not accurate.

The Roster sheet is meant to be used for 2022 only. A copy for 2023 will be made in January and numbers will be adjusted for years on contracts etc. 

 

Edited by SirA1
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LAOJoe said:

probably because it's not sorted by adjusted wins. Although the rest of the standings don't do tiebreakers well. Those are complicated though but it would be nice if they sorted by division wins then point differential.

yeah, spent 10 minutes looking at formulas and that's all it needed was being sorted...haha.

Good eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ny92mike said:

yeah, spent 10 minutes looking at formulas and that's all it needed was being sorted...haha.

Good eye.

The standings are close. The rest might have to be manually done though bc of H2H tiebreakers. Flint would be 5th for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...