Jump to content

Nacho Simulation Football League (Season 24 - Taco Bowl XXIV POSTED!)


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said:

I'll start with 8 or more. Any takers?

I firmly am against the concept of "betting" picks. It creates a really BS imbalance of the league

However I'm willing to swap 1sts with you preseason.. ie, we would each be better we have more wins than the other

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tk3 said:

Defensive Rankings

  1. 86.8 Royals
  2. 86.0 Samurai
  3. 84.9 Predators
  4. 84.8 Puppets
  5. 84.7 Starfall
  6. 84.7 Papermakers
  7. 84.6 Rattlers
  8. 84.3 Kongs
  9. 84.3 Direwolves
  10. 83.9 Squirrels
  11. 82.9 Blobfish
  12. 82.7 Thunder
  13. 82.6 Amish
  14. 82.1 Venom
  15. 81.1 Pirates
  16. 80.8 Bighorns
  17. 80.3 Orcas
  18. 79.6 Ukpiks
  19. 78.9 Walruses
  20. 78.0 Polar Bears

Feels low, but my defense was bad last year too, so I probably suck at drafting defensive players.

I'm not expecting my ILBs (Bentley and Oklokun) to be great, but I'd be shocked if my secondary was horrible, and I tend to think that, if Atkins is decent, my front four should be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said:

Feels low, but my defense was bad last year too, so I probably suck at drafting defensive players.

I'm not expecting my ILBs (Bentley and Oklokun) to be great, but I'd be shocked if my secondary was horrible, and I tend to think that, if Atkins is decent, my front four should be fine.

I guess the one spoiler I should say is that the grading ratings I used really do not seem to like rookies. So it has Hutch a little lower than I think is realistic, and agreed, it doesn't love any of your LBs

Your secondary might not be horrible, but I do think it is below average

I guess I'm not saying I think your defense is horrible, but if you are a playoff team, I think it will be on the backs of your passing game, and somewhat in spite of your defense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

I firmly am against the concept of "betting" picks. It creates a really BS imbalance of the league

However I'm willing to swap 1sts with you preseason.. ie, we would each be betting we have more wins than the other

guess @TL-TwoWinsAway is not interested

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

chicken

portia de rossi dancing GIF

So: first of all, love this.

Secondly, I'm a huge fan of the "I'm firmly against the concept of betting picks, but allow me to offer to bet picks because I think it'll benefit me" mentality. Very... "I enjoy the high ground, but not really" sneaky.

Thirdly, I'm offering to bet based on my own win total. Why would I offer to swap picks with someone who has been in the league for years and should be better than me based off of experience alone?

Fourthly, and most importantly: I don't have a S25 1st round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said:

So: first of all, love this.

Secondly, I'm a huge fan of the "I'm firmly against the concept of betting picks, but allow me to offer to bet picks because I think it'll benefit me" mentality. Very... "I enjoy the high ground, but not really" sneaky.

Thirdly, I'm offering to bet based on my own win total. Why would I offer to swap picks with someone who has been in the league for years and should be better than me based off of experience alone?

Fourthly, and most importantly: I don't have a S25 1st round pick.

I mean.. big difference between basically swapping up or down a couple of picks vs one team getting an asset for absolutely nothing

I do think it is conceptually a very different thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tk3 said:

I mean.. big difference between basically swapping up or down a couple of picks vs one team getting an asset for absolutely nothing

I do think it is conceptually a very different thing

Eh. I consider it to be within the realm of betting picks.

I'm surprised that your rating is so low on my secondary, tbh. Landon Collins had a strong S24, and I can't help but think that Richard Sherman should make a strong sim FS. I guess we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tk3 said:

Decided to do my own set of ratings.. Used an impartial source to "grade" players - although some of the grades I don't trust, in general it gives an impartial grading system. Then I put forward a formula to weight positional importance

Overall rankings

  1. 87.9 Royals
  2. 87.1 Puppets
  3. 85.9 Papermakers
  4. 85.5 Rattlers
  5. 85.4 Squirrels
  6. 85.3 Direwolves
  7. 85.3 Pirates
  8. 85.3 Predators
  9. 85.0 Kongs
  10. 84.8 Samurai
  11. 84.1 Venom
  12. 83.8 Starfall
  13. 82.5 Ukpiks
  14. 82.2 Blobfish
  15. 82.1 Walruses
  16. 82.0 Amish
  17. 81.7 Bighorns
  18. 80.8 Thunder
  19. 79.9 Orcas
  20. 79.6 Polar Bears (rip, twins)

Offensive Rankings

  1. 89.1 Puppets
  2. 89.0 Pirates
  3. 88.9 Royals
  4. 86.9 Papermakers
  5. 86.7 Squirrels
  6. 86.3 Rattlers
  7. 86.2 Direwolves
  8. 85.8 Venom
  9. 85.7 Kongs
  10. 85.6 Predators
  11. 85.0 Ukpiks
  12. 84.9 Walruses
  13. 83.8 Samurai
  14. 82.9 Starfall
  15. 82.5 Bighorns
  16. 81.6 Blobfish
  17. 81.4 Amish
  18. 81.0 Polar Bears
  19. 79.7 Orcas
  20. 79.1 Thunder

Defensive Rankings

  1. 86.8 Royals
  2. 86.0 Samurai
  3. 84.9 Predators
  4. 84.8 Puppets
  5. 84.7 Starfall
  6. 84.7 Papermakers
  7. 84.6 Rattlers
  8. 84.3 Kongs
  9. 84.3 Direwolves
  10. 83.9 Squirrels
  11. 82.9 Blobfish
  12. 82.7 Thunder
  13. 82.6 Amish
  14. 82.1 Venom
  15. 81.1 Pirates
  16. 80.8 Bighorns
  17. 80.3 Orcas
  18. 79.6 Ukpiks
  19. 78.9 Walruses
  20. 78.0 Polar Bears

 

I think this listing undersells the Kong and Venom a little bit, but there it is

Obviously rookies are knocked a lot which is fine i guess.  I'd take my team in real life over all the others and that is really all I can build.  The sim is gonna sim. 

lets-rock.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...