Packer_ESP Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 9 hours ago, Mr Anonymous said: That ship has sailed. Rodgers will be the Packers QB in 2023 and Love will get his shot somewhere else. You already made this prediction last year - hell, not a prediction, you knew because you had inside sources. How did that turn out? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
persiandud Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 putting Mike McCarthy's name in the same conversation as those offensive gurus is....something. if we're being real, i think people in this chat overrate McCarthy because they already have that confirmation bias about Rodgers. it's a convenient segue. "see, Rodgers is trash now, we should have traded him!" which is fine...but then sometimes it comes with "we should have kept McCarthy over Rodgers" nah lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Anonymous Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 It's quite the sight seeing someone trying to push the notion that in a divorce of Rodgers and McCarthy, it's McCarthy that should have been kept around given Rodgers has won 2 MVPs since said divorce and McCarthy now coaches in a place where the fanbase there also doesn't want him. It was literally just 10 days ago when McCarthy reminded us for the umpteenth time of his deficiencies. But agendas gonna agenda. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Anonymous Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 (edited) 4 hours ago, Packer_ESP said: You already made this prediction last year - hell, not a prediction, you knew because you had inside sources. How did that turn out? Still on track. Said he'd be gone before Rodgers and speculated he'd be traded at or before this past draft because the return they could have netted made sense. Made it clear that the timing was speculation and owned it when that the draft came and went with Love still in Green Bay. Have been spot on with everything as has unfolded with Rodgers - literally the only one. Maybe when Murphy steps aside early people like you will start accepting that I know a few things, but probably not and that's fine. Edited November 23, 2022 by Mr Anonymous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefj85 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 4 hours ago, persiandud said: putting Mike McCarthy's name in the same conversation as those offensive gurus is....something. if we're being real, i think people in this chat overrate McCarthy because they already have that confirmation bias about Rodgers. it's a convenient segue. "see, Rodgers is trash now, we should have traded him!" which is fine...but then sometimes it comes with "we should have kept McCarthy over Rodgers" nah lol MM was an innovator man! He had Rodgers practice the scramble drill!!! And he used this one formation, you know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 1 hour ago, Mr Anonymous said: Still on track. Said he'd be gone before Rodgers and speculated he'd be traded at or before this past draft because the return they could have netted made sense. Made it clear that the timing was speculation and owned it when that the draft came and went with Love still in Green Bay. Have been spot on with everything as has unfolded with Rodgers - literally the only one. Maybe when Murphy steps aside early people like you will start accepting that I know a few things, but probably not and that's fine. You were adamant that Love would be traded this past offseason, and you said he'd be traded for a bag of potato chips. Just admit you were wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Anonymous Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 (edited) 9 minutes ago, CWood21 said: You were adamant that Love would be traded this past offseason, and you said he'd be traded for a bag of potato chips. Just admit you were wrong. Complete lie. You're an abysmal moderator. I was adamant that Love would depart before Rodgers and speculated on the timing. Indicated that the value was there to save face on a Love trade and never suggested anything remotely close to dumping him for nothing. You're pathetic. When a moderator blatantly lies and misrepresents what members of the forum have stated, what kind of forum do you have? Yikes. Edited November 23, 2022 by Mr Anonymous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, Mr Anonymous said: Complete lie. You're an abysmal moderator. I was adamant that Love would depart before Rodgers and speculated on the timing. Indicated that the value was there to save face on a Love trade and never suggested anything remotely close to dumping him for nothing. You're pathetic. Glad you're taking this personally. If you have issues with my moderation, feel free to PM Webby. As it's been discussed ad nauseam, Jordan Love only gets dealt in a situation where the Packers get legitimate value in return for him. It would have cost the Packers more money to trade him and sign a different QB to replace him than it would for him to remain under contract with Green Bay. That's a fact. Jordan Love leaving Green Bay wasn't the likely scenario pre-extension for Aaron Rodgers. The extension changed that with how convoluted that deal was, and quite frankly irresponsible from the Packers' FO to give him that kind of deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 Guys, can we not disagree without attacking the person? I really like the back and forth, but like that doesn't make anyone stupid because they disagree. And I don't care who did it first or who did it worse. Talk football, man. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 2 hours ago, Mr Anonymous said: Still on track. Said he'd be gone before Rodgers and speculated he'd be traded at or before this past draft because the return they could have netted made sense. Made it clear that the timing was speculation and owned it when that the draft came and went with Love still in Green Bay. Have been spot on with everything as has unfolded with Rodgers - literally the only one. Maybe when Murphy steps aside early people like you will start accepting that I know a few things, but probably not and that's fine. I agree with this. I think the only way that Love is the starter is if Rodgers decides that he wants to retire after this season. And I don't think that he is going to do that. I don't even think that drafting Love was that bad of a move, however, it was extremely poorly timed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 2 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: I agree with this. I think the only way that Love is the starter is if Rodgers decides that he wants to retire after this season. And I don't think that he is going to do that. I don't even think that drafting Love was that bad of a move, however, it was extremely poorly timed. The general consensus was that Love was taken a year too early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 15 hours ago, chefj85 said: Oh god ffs you act like MM was the first coach to vary formations. Give me a break. You know less than nothing. You are thoroughly embarrassing yourself 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefj85 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 7 minutes ago, Norm said: You are thoroughly embarrassing yourself So youre saying that MM was the first to vary formations? quit being a coward and put your name on something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 22 minutes ago, CWood21 said: The general consensus was that Love was taken a year too early. To be honest, it may have been 3 or 4 years too early. If Rodgers plays out this contract, a drafted rookie in 2023 will be entering year 3 when Rodgers would be out. I will say that I am a fan of Jordan Love. He has not said a word since being drafted about wanting to play or trade me or anything like that, at least not externally. He just comes to work and does what they tell him to do. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted November 23, 2022 Share Posted November 23, 2022 1 hour ago, Mr Anonymous said: 1 hour ago, CWood21 said: You were adamant that Love would be traded this past offseason, and you said he'd be traded for a bag of potato chips. Just admit you were wrong. Complete lie. You're an abysmal moderator. I was adamant that Love would depart before Rodgers and speculated on the timing. Indicated that the value was there to save face on a Love trade and never suggested anything remotely close to dumping him for nothing. You're pathetic. When a moderator blatantly lies and misrepresents what members of the forum have stated, what kind of forum do you have? Yikes. ....... something about Love being traded in 27 hours or someone would be very wrong 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts