NFLGURU Posted April 2, 2023 Share Posted April 2, 2023 (edited) Went with Van Ness. Edited April 2, 2023 by NFLGURU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isherwood Posted April 2, 2023 Share Posted April 2, 2023 1 hour ago, NFLGURU said: Went with Van Ness. Same. Van Ness and then Mayer. It would be a reach to take Mayer there, but we’ve seen years of (if you believe rumors) GB missing out on pass catchers they’ve liked at the top of the draft. Maybe I’m in the minority, but wouldn’t mind spending a year just stocking up there even if you have to reach a little. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted April 2, 2023 Share Posted April 2, 2023 (edited) I think taking a TE in the top 20 or so picks is almost always a mistake. I think Green Bay is more likely to trade up from a second to get the TE they covet than actually take one high. The Packers and the Eagles might be the two most dogmatic teams when it comes to "take high valued positions with your top pick" but if you get a 2nd FRP all bets are off. Edited April 2, 2023 by PossibleCabbage 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted April 2, 2023 Share Posted April 2, 2023 6 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said: I think taking a TE in the top 20 or so picks is almost always a mistake TE, RB and S are no-go's for me in that range unless there's a huge, huge outlier. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted April 2, 2023 Share Posted April 2, 2023 11 minutes ago, incognito_man said: TE, RB and S are no-go's for me in that range unless there's a huge, huge outlier. Yeah, if you have a huge grade on Bijan you would take him before a TE at 15 because you only consider non-premiums in the first unless they are a tier above who's available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackFan13 Posted April 2, 2023 Share Posted April 2, 2023 (edited) Van Ness. Trade up to end of first for Kincaid, take Washington with the other second round pick. Edited April 2, 2023 by PackFan13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted April 2, 2023 Share Posted April 2, 2023 2 hours ago, PossibleCabbage said: Yeah, if you have a huge grade on Bijan you would take him before a TE at 15 because you only consider non-premiums in the first unless they are a tier above who's available. gute would trade down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HokieHigh Posted April 2, 2023 Share Posted April 2, 2023 2 hours ago, PossibleCabbage said: I think taking a TE in the top 20 or so picks is almost always a mistake. I think Green Bay is more likely to trade up from a second to get the TE they covet than actually take one high. The Packers and the Eagles might be the two most dogmatic teams when it comes to "take high valued positions with your top pick" but if you get a 2nd FRP all bets are off. yes, prioritizing high value positions is a great principle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted April 3, 2023 Share Posted April 3, 2023 3 hours ago, PackFan13 said: Van Ness. Trade up to end of first for Kincaid, take Washington with the other second round pick. I really have a hard time believing Washington is going to be available but we’ll see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted April 3, 2023 Share Posted April 3, 2023 I could see Washington being one of the first guys off the board on Day 2. If Gute wants him, might have to do what he did to get Christian Watson last year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svp Posted April 3, 2023 Share Posted April 3, 2023 Peak offseason sucks! yayy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted April 3, 2023 Share Posted April 3, 2023 Digging a little bit deeper on some WRs, both Matt Landers and Jadon Haselwood from Arkansas seem to tick the athletic boxes. And the highlights look pretty nice too. Both are late round to UDFA as far as prospect rankings. I like them, at least the highlights I have seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Posted April 3, 2023 Share Posted April 3, 2023 8 minutes ago, ThatJerkDave said: Digging a little bit deeper on some WRs, both Matt Landers and Jadon Haselwood from Arkansas seem to tick the athletic boxes. And the highlights look pretty nice too. Both are late round to UDFA as far as prospect rankings. I like them, at least the highlights I have seen. I've seen Landers compared to MVS but haven't watched much of him myself. Wouldn't be the worst way to spend a 5th rounder. I'll take a look at Haselwood though, especially since I need more late round WR crushes now that I found out Iosivas has tiny hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted April 3, 2023 Share Posted April 3, 2023 6 minutes ago, Sandy said: I've seen Landers compared to MVS but haven't watched much of him myself. Wouldn't be the worst way to spend a 5th rounder. I'll take a look at Haselwood though, especially since I need more late round WR crushes now that I found out Iosivas has tiny hands. Landers compares to Iosivas pretty well athletically. Haselwood has 10' hands, and Landers has 9 1/4 hands. Haselwood ran a pretty slow 40 at the combine, but the highlights show a faster player. He won't be confused for Trindon Holliday, but he isn't really a 4.66 guy either. Probably as fast as JSN. Landers has a better ras than MVS did. They ran about the same, but MVS jumped really poorly. I am sure there are negatives to their games. They are late rounders for a reason. But my first impression of both of them is pretty good. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted April 3, 2023 Share Posted April 3, 2023 15 hours ago, PackFan13 said: Van Ness. Trade up to end of first for Kincaid, take Washington with the other second round pick. This is about the worst scenario I can think of. Taking two TE's by pick 46. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts