Jump to content

QB Talk Once Again.... sigh


JetsandI

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, JetsandI said:

22m on injury prone qb.   eh?

The concern is injuries not performance. Would you rather spend $22M on a bad QB who will likely stay healthy?

That number allows to also add a quality back up while not allocating a larger portion of the QB to just the QB position. So in the event he does get injured they have a good back up stepping in. 

It's a good deal for the Raiders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KingOfNewYork said:

The concern is injuries not performance. Would you rather spend $22M on a bad QB who will likely stay healthy?

That number allows to also add a quality back up while not allocating a larger portion of the QB to just the QB position. So in the event he does get injured they have a good back up stepping in. 

It's a good deal for the Raiders. 

I will revise my thinking if Jameis Winston and Jacoby Brissett are somehow receiving 22m.

 

Jimmy G getting false hope for playoff spot is sickening. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Greene N White said:

Given the option between Jameis, Baker, and Brissett I'm taking Jameis all day. I wouldn't be entirely shocked if he had a Geno Smith type career revival wherever he goes.

He seems like a player to me that needs excellent coaching. Now I’m reminded we have Hackett and no Rodgers LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...