Mazrimiv Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) 1 minute ago, Norm said: Lol why is this so terrible Simple #JetsHaveAllTheLeverage Edited January 28 by Mazrimiv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 11 minutes ago, squire12 said: This is top notch stuff!!! Damn you, I couldn't resist. I had to reply to that trade proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 9 minutes ago, Norm said: Lol why is this so terrible We'd be giving up picks #25, #41 & #57 for pick #10? Nah, I'd opt to stay put. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 6 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: We'd be giving up picks #25, #41 & #57 for pick #10? Nah, I'd opt to stay put. It becomes a question of do we have enough roster space for 3 players versus just one. And picking at 10 gives us more to choose from. OTOH keeping the three picks gives us ammunition to move around as the draft unfolds to target players Gute really likes, and Gute has done a remarkable job lately finding those players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Just now, Mr. Fussnputz said: It becomes a question of do we have enough roster space for 3 players versus just one. And picking at 10 gives us more to choose from. OTOH keeping the three picks gives us ammunition to move around as the draft unfolds to target players Gute really likes, and Gute has done a remarkable job lately finding those players. I think you are wildly overrating the depth of this roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, Mazrimiv said: I think you are wildly overrating the depth of this roster. Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that. That's why I posed it as a question. I think we stay put until the draft, but I expect some movement during the draft targeting players Gute really likes. I've been very impressed with how Gute has managed the draft lately. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 26 minutes ago, Norm said: Lol why is this so terrible Does GB need a WR/TE that badly to move pick 25 +41 +57? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 minute ago, Mr. Fussnputz said: Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that. That's why I posed it as a question. I think we stay put until the draft, but I expect some movement during the draft targeting players Gute really likes. I've been very impressed with how Gute has managed the draft lately. Gute's never been shy about moving around in the draft. I'm sure this draft will be more of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Fussnputz Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Just now, Mazrimiv said: Gute's never been shy about moving around in the draft. I'm sure this draft will be more of that. Yes, and hats off to the Packer's scouts for finding some real gems later in the draft. That's why I think Gute keeps his draft ammo to move around and draft those prospects where they're rated. One more draft like last year's and we're in great position to make a run at the Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 4 minutes ago, squire12 said: Does GB need a WR/TE that badly to move pick 25 +41 +57? **** no. I guess I just trusted he said it's close on the chart so it didn't register as a big deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 23 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: We'd be giving up picks #25, #41 & #57 for pick #10? Nah, I'd opt to stay put. For real. I can't even think of any player we'd even want at 10. If we want to move up to take one of the top four corners, we'd at least wait until a couple of them were taken first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazrimiv Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 7 minutes ago, squire12 said: Does GB need a WR/TE that badly to move pick 25 +41 +57? I would think it would have to be an OT for GB to make that move. I wouldn't even be overly critical of that kind of move if Walker had been a train wreck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 4 minutes ago, Mazrimiv said: I think you are wildly overrating the depth of this roster. I see what he is saying, but... -We have 2 RBs under contract: Aaron Jones at his high number, and Ellis Merriweather. -We have 4 safeties under contract: Anthony Johnson Jr, Zayne Anderson, Tyler Coyle, and Zyon Gilbert. Benny Sapp III is an ERFA and is also pretty easily retained. -CB is: Jaire, Valentine, Stokes, and the other Anthony Johnson. We are deep at WR, TE, LB (at the moment), QB, and probably DL. If we turn off injuries, we are probably good at OL as well. I don't think we should be giving up 3 premium picks for 1 though. Those 3 picks could be a safety, RB, and OL that play significant snaps in the next couple of seasons. The top 10 guy is fun, but only fills one hole. And looking at where we could use help, as well as the draft class, that is probably taking OT number 3 or 4, which probably fits the softest of our roster needs at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 8 minutes ago, Norm said: **** no. I guess I just trusted he said it's close on the chart so it didn't register as a big deal If he says it makes sense on a trade chart, I believe the guy. MOST people here aren't just making up stupid trades for the sake of it. I don't think the Jets fan is too familiar with our roster though. No way are we looking at a WR/TE in a trade up, especially with our talented youth. And I would bet that he was thinking the Jets would benefit from more picks rather than high picks. It really isn't too terrible of an idea on paper. I don't think it is a good deal for the Packers. But I honestly don't think he was thinking it was a super rip off either. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Interesting Mock where we land DeJean. The rest of it is a bit meh, no offensive linemen in the first three rounds. 2024 NFL Mock Draft: Round 3 – WalterFootball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts