WFLukic Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Jonathan Simmons is Jeffery Simmons lol. Bcb moment. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Gimme the Jazz cause McCaffrey and missing a starting OT are just enough to tip the edge to the Jazz, stafford and MHJ keep this close though since I'd imagine they'd air the ball out a bit more here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirA1 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 1 minute ago, Xmad said: Gimme the Jazz cause McCaffrey and missing a starting OT are just enough to tip the edge to the Jazz, stafford and MHJ keep this close though since I'd imagine they'd air the ball out a bit more here. The Jazz are the ones missing the starting OT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 3 minutes ago, SirA1 said: The Jazz are the ones missing the starting OT I can't type my man, Havenstein being for the Jazz hurts and Danielle hunter/Johnson ll will feast but McCaffrey being out when your next best RB is Zach moss.....just enough. Also **** the 49ers for not announcing it on friday cause they hurt the BDL and fantasy community. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BodyBurner Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 I think the Jazz take this one. It’s hard to see the firebirds replacing McCaffery. Their offense was designed around him and I don’t see an adequate replacement on the roster. On top of that the rest of their offensive weapons are average to below average. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 16 hours ago, RuskieTitan said: Christian McCaffrey did not play. Incorrect C. McCaffery 156 tot yds 1 rush td 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 35 minutes ago, BodyBurner said: I think the Jazz take this one. It’s hard to see the firebirds replacing McCaffery. Their offense was designed around him and I don’t see an adequate replacement on the roster. On top of that the rest of their offensive weapons are average to below average. If only there was someone on my roster than could step in for McCaffrey and run for 147 and 1. If only I could have someone, anyone who has the ability to do that 😎 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Taking New Orleans in a close game, but, I don't think the absence of CMAC hurts Raleigh as bad as it wouls first seem, the next men up are respectable. Having said that, I do think NOs running game does just enough more to get close it out. Both of you did a great job here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BodyBurner Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 27 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: If only there was someone on my roster than could step in for McCaffrey and run for 147 and 1. If only I could have someone, anyone who has the ability to do that 😎 Don’t be petty, sarcastic, and bitter. It’s unbecoming. You didn’t know on Friday McCaffrey wasn’t playing, and you aren’t playing the Jets who refuse to pay one of this best defense players. You also still don’t have a QB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 (edited) 8 hours ago, EaglesPeteC said: If only there was someone on my roster than could step in for McCaffrey and run for 147 and 1. If only I could have someone, anyone who has the ability to do that 😎 Had you listed Mason first on your RB depth chart, I would've considered him as a direct replacement and lessened the blow of being without CMC. (Although Mason is clearly not as effective as CMC as a pass-catcher, which still would've conflicted with your gameplan.) Edited September 11 by TL-TwoWinsAway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EaglesPeteC Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 39 minutes ago, TL-TwoWinsAway said: Had you listed Mason first on your RB depth chart, I would've considered him as a direct replacement and lessened the blow of being without CMC. (Although Mason is clearly not as effective as CMC as a pass-catcher, which still would've conflicted with your gameplan.) I know, I just like being a turd. Its my thing lol. That's what makes McCaffrey such a double edged sword. He is so unique as a talent that if something like this happens, it really sets a pre-written gameplan on fire. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TL-TwoWinsAway Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 32 minutes ago, EaglesPeteC said: I know, I just like being a turd. Its my thing lol. That's what makes McCaffrey such a double edged sword. He is so unique as a talent that if something like this happens, it really sets a pre-written gameplan on fire. But you're our turd. Don't ever change. (True on the rest.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Shout out to whoever Jonathan Simmons is. Like others have said, The cmc absence is brutal here. He's such a unique talent that when you devise a plan around him and have to go to other differing types of RB, it just doesn't work as well. I don't dislike the Raleigh WR as much as others but Sutton is tied to Nix so woof and Harrison will have better days, but like Caleb in another mathcup, he has to show us the good days first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedGold Posted September 11 Author Share Posted September 11 Raleigh by a bill.... Sorry Pete, Losing the main piece of your offensive gameplan (to no fault of your own), sucks. I think the backups do a decent enough job to keep the game close, but NO is a to well rounded to make up for the loss of C-Mac. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 No McCaffrey means that offense is struggling to move the ball more and won't score at a clip big enough to win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.