incognito_man Posted Saturday at 01:22 AM Share Posted Saturday at 01:22 AM 3 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: I’m not sure how serious this discussion is but why the need to compare which is better of Rodgers free plays vs Jayden Reed TDs? They’re both a thing of beauty on their own. i know this comment may ruffle some feathers, but imagine prime Rodgers playing with Reed. Would have been a thing of beauty. He’s a more talented Cobb. Then again watching him with Love is wonderful too. I'm dead serious. I'll put my money where my mouth is. Will chicken-boy?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted Saturday at 01:46 AM Share Posted Saturday at 01:46 AM (edited) 54 minutes ago, incognito_man said: How about you put your money where your sassy little mouth is and accept my bet: $10k Jayden Reed TDs > Aaron Rodgers free play TDs min 6 games played each or bet cancels I take Jayden, you take Aaron Ohhhh sassy! LMFAO. Who said I don't like Reed? I love Jayden Reed, but not as much as I enjoy getting under your skin putting your own silly 'gimmick,' rant back in your lap. Also, Rodgers has had 18 of those TDs in his career. So, that's a little over 1 a year when he's been starting. I'm not as dumb as you look with your 'gimmick,' bet. Even if your bet proposal was reasonable, I don't gamble on sports, ever. I'm looking forward to Incog's 'gimmick' play of the week that needs to be backed out of a player's stats to make a point of trying to trash somebody. Many here thought I was the resident Aaron Rodgers hater. I hand the crown over to you. Wear the hate well! Edited Saturday at 01:49 AM by Old Guy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted Saturday at 01:53 AM Share Posted Saturday at 01:53 AM 5 minutes ago, Old Guy said: BA GAWWWWK 🐔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted Saturday at 03:53 AM Share Posted Saturday at 03:53 AM 4 hours ago, incognito_man said: Reed is the #1 WR in the league through 1 game. Would suck to lose him. So the Packers have a #1 wide receiver? 😶 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted Saturday at 04:51 AM Share Posted Saturday at 04:51 AM 57 minutes ago, Brat&Beer said: So the Packers have a #1 wide receiver? 😶 *THE #1 😎 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted Saturday at 01:03 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 01:03 PM Hope the dream stays alive another day but if I had to guess, the Packers will elevate Clifford today and probably downgrade Love to out. I think the questionable tag was likely to buy one more day of suspense for Indy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted Saturday at 04:00 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:00 PM 2 hours ago, packfanfb said: Hope the dream stays alive another day but if I had to guess, the Packers will elevate Clifford today and probably downgrade Love to out. I think the questionable tag was likely to buy one more day of suspense for Indy. Yeah .. none of the talking heads are buying the idea that Love can play tomorrow. They also don't seem to think he will play next week either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted Saturday at 04:30 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 04:30 PM 26 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: Yeah .. none of the talking heads are buying the idea that Love can play tomorrow. They also don't seem to think he will play next week either. Week 4 is the most logical return game. Division game at home. Packers just need to avoid 0-3 before they get there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toddfather Posted Saturday at 04:51 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:51 PM I thought the league might be a little pushier about announcing whose out after the CMC deal, but I guess not. I still don't see him playing for a couple weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted Saturday at 05:32 PM Share Posted Saturday at 05:32 PM Sean Clifford elevated to GameDay roster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted Saturday at 05:39 PM Share Posted Saturday at 05:39 PM 47 minutes ago, Toddfather said: I thought the league might be a little pushier about announcing whose out after the CMC deal, but I guess not. I still don't see him playing for a couple weeks. What did SF do that was against any rules? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brat&Beer Posted Saturday at 05:42 PM Share Posted Saturday at 05:42 PM (edited) Wrong thread Edited Saturday at 05:49 PM by Brat&Beer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toddfather Posted Saturday at 06:17 PM Share Posted Saturday at 06:17 PM 36 minutes ago, squire12 said: What did SF do that was against any rules? They didn't do anything against the rules, but with how attached sportsbooks are with the NFL now I am sure there are a lot of people that were pissed that they waited that long when the report from the player is he knew on Friday he was starting. I'm not saying the NFL would do anything, but if we know one thing about the NFL it's they love the $$$. Just a thought I had. I haven't seen any reporting about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted Saturday at 06:55 PM Share Posted Saturday at 06:55 PM 35 minutes ago, Toddfather said: They didn't do anything against the rules, but with how attached sportsbooks are with the NFL now I am sure there are a lot of people that were pissed that they waited that long when the report from the player is he knew on Friday he was starting. I'm not saying the NFL would do anything, but if we know one thing about the NFL it's they love the $$$. Just a thought I had. I haven't seen any reporting about it. Mason saying he was told he would start doesn't mean that CMC would not play. Mason could have started and CMC could still have played. Did the sports books lose money on CMC not playing? If not, then the sports books don't really care and by extension the NFL won't really care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toddfather Posted Saturday at 06:57 PM Share Posted Saturday at 06:57 PM 1 minute ago, squire12 said: Mason saying he was told he would start doesn't mean that CMC would not play. Mason could have started and CMC could still have played. Did the sports books lose money on CMC not playing? If not, then the sports books don't really care and by extension the NFL won't really care. I think it's pretty clear he was never starting. I was just wondering if the league would say anything. Obviously they didn't. It was an opinion, not a hill I'm going to die on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.