skibrett15 Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 (edited) 17 hours ago, incognito_man said: So is it the case that both GB and MIN front office are wrong and you are right? me and cleveland yea but seriously, the stats posted are wrong, or at least highly subjective. At least compare pressure stats from the same data source. Preston's pressures were the PFF number, so compare Z's to that number. Edited May 26, 2023 by skibrett15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 26, 2023 Author Share Posted May 26, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 6 minutes ago, Leader said: Wow! No market for him or did he have a no trade clause? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 26, 2023 Author Share Posted May 26, 2023 1 minute ago, Old Guy said: Wow! No market for him or did he have a no trade clause? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 Don’t understand why people on Twitter want him in GB ( not like it’s gonna happen ) long term success is Watson , Doubs, Reed and the TEs . I don’t want a aging veteran taking away snaps and targets from them 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R T Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 26 minutes ago, Leader said: Prime example of 'a team trades for a contract a player come along in the deal'. The contract has as much to do with trade value as the player does, sometimes more. In Hopkins case the contract made him worthless on the trade market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Refugee Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 9 minutes ago, Rainmaker90 said: Don’t understand why people on Twitter want him in GB ( not like it’s gonna happen ) long term success is Watson , Doubs, Reed and the TEs . I don’t want a aging veteran taking away snaps and targets from them There is some argument to be made for a true veteran voice on the offensive side. Absolutely this is a developmental year for many guys but to be in their best trajectory the young guys need snaps and a good influence on how to grow as a pro. We do not have the cap for top of the market vets but I am still on board for a Cobb or Lewis type of guy in those rooms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 16 minutes ago, Refugee said: There is some argument to be made for a true veteran voice on the offensive side. Absolutely this is a developmental year for many guys but to be in their best trajectory the young guys need snaps and a good influence on how to grow as a pro. We do not have the cap for top of the market vets but I am still on board for a Cobb or Lewis type of guy in those rooms. Absolutely. I’m very shocked they don’t have one. I just don’t want a guy who is going to demand a lot of snaps 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 26, 2023 Author Share Posted May 26, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 26, 2023 Author Share Posted May 26, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrILL! Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 Oof. Leave the sketch comedy to ppl like Annie Agar, Nagler. Stay in your lane lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Guy Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 3 hours ago, Rainmaker90 said: Don’t understand why people on Twitter want him in GB ( not like it’s gonna happen ) long term success is Watson , Doubs, Reed and the TEs . I don’t want a aging veteran taking away snaps and targets from them Not to mention gobbling up cap space that can be rolled over if we don't use it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rainmaker90 Posted May 26, 2023 Share Posted May 26, 2023 1 hour ago, Old Guy said: Not to mention gobbling up cap space that can be rolled over if we don't use it. Right! We’re starting to get back to being fiscally responsible! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted May 27, 2023 Share Posted May 27, 2023 (edited) 11 hours ago, skibrett15 said: me and cleveland yea but seriously, the stats posted are wrong, or at least highly subjective. At least compare pressure stats from the same data source. Preston's pressures were the PFF number, so compare Z's to that number. If you find yourself relying on Cleveland to support your stance, it's time to re-evaluate your stance. *Also, again you're comparing apples and hand grenades. GB couldn't have gotten Z two years ago for the paycheck that Cleveland is giving him. Edited May 27, 2023 by incognito_man Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted May 28, 2023 Share Posted May 28, 2023 So Davante Adams would probably be a better front office for the Raiders than their actual front office huh? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.