Ragnarok Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 1 minute ago, MD4L said: I increased the per year salary by 5 percent. Ah, so you did. Time to bid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 9 minutes ago, Ragnarok said: Also not valid cause you didn't raise it by 5%. Why I am helping an owner this established is beyond me. I'm gonna shut up and just let the clock run out next time. Why I am helping an owner this established is beyond me. I'm gonna shut up and just let the clock run out next time!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcb1213 Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Could have sworn it was higher than 5 percent Maybe not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Just now, MD4L said: Why I am helping an owner this established is beyond me. I'm gonna shut up and just let the clock run out next time!!!!!! I just didnt you to feel bad. So I purposely screwed up too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 1 minute ago, Ragnarok said: I just didnt you to feel bad. So I purposely screwed up too. All is fair in love and war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 ******* stupid. Yes lets pay the guy the money he already has been paid on his original BDL contract again just because he has one year left on his original deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 I mean I don't think we are paying a guy what he's already been paid we're paying a guy the total cost of the contract. I don't know I don't really have an opinion on this subject I don't care either way but I don't think it's that serious in most cases you talking about nickels and dimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 1 minute ago, wwhickok said: I mean I don't think we are paying a guy what he's already been paid we're paying a guy the total cost of the contract. I don't know I don't really have an opinion on this subject I don't care either way but I don't think it's that serious in most cases you talking about nickels and dimes They front loaded his contract. Gilbert had a deal before this year based on that. Now I have to pay the front load for his one year left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Just now, PR said: They front loaded his contract. Gilbert had a deal before this year based on that. Now I have to pay the front load for his one year left. Yeah I mean I guess in a way it's a slippery slope. I can see the argument from both sides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Just now, PR said: They front loaded his contract. Gilbert had a deal before this year based on that. Now I have to pay the front load for his one year left. You could’ve given him a short term deal. Look at 37 year old tackles getting 5 year deals lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PR Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 1 minute ago, MD4L said: You could’ve given him a short term deal. Look at 37 year old tackles getting 5 year deals lol. Short or long is the same price Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 2 minutes ago, PR said: Short or long is the same price Clearly if you are frustrated about the paying the front end of a deal offer him a short term and get it reworked when he tests the market. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jlash Posted June 4, 2019 Author Share Posted June 4, 2019 Its a matter of keeping this system simple. If everyone gets to pro rate based on years left rather than average salary of the contract it will be a mess. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 I'm making a new proposal for the owners meeting. I'm suggesting we eliminate the ability to make an offer from last year's on a free agent without significantly increasing the offer and I'm talking way over 5%. It sort of cheapens the free agency Concept in this format when you can pretty much run up the price on somebody and enable yourself to just three down the player The Following season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD4L Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Just now, wwhickok said: I'm making a new proposal for the owners meeting. I'm suggesting we eliminate the ability to make an offer from last year's on a free agent without significantly increasing the offer and I'm talking way over 5%. It sort of cheapens the free agency Concept in this format when you can pretty much run up the price on somebody and enable yourself to just three down the player The Following season And signing 37 year old tackles to 5 year contracts isn’t another cheesy way to combat the system? I’m not running up a price on anyone. I want the same guy you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts